Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • News releases
    • February 8, 2010
    • December 20, 2010
  • Climate Realists
    • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
    • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
    • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
    • Newsletter #4 2011
  • Files
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Clouding the issue

Richard Treadgold | June 15, 2009

Clouds are the issue in more than one facet of global warming. Apart from causing rain, clouds have two important effects: cooling and warming. Dr Roy Spencer, one of few scientists studying clouds, has said that a sustained change in cloud cover of just 1%, up or down, can cause a Medieval Warm Period or a Little Ice Age.

Cooling is achieved by reflecting back the heat from the sun; warming is done by keeping that heat in, like a blanket. I’m not an expert on clouds, but from my reading I’ve got the impression that low-level clouds usually cause cooling and high-level clouds usually keep the warmth in. I also think they might do both, at different times of the day.

For example, low clouds at night keep things warm — a clear sky means a cold night — while low clouds during the day reduce temperatures. We’ve all experienced the sudden cooling as a cloud moves across the sun on a hot day.

It’s a current and vexed question to discover just how these conflicting effects are influenced by increasing humidity, whether that acts to raise or to lower air temperatures and what the balance of the effects is around the world. As the global temperature rises (though I’m not suggesting that it is right now) more water evaporates. Where does the resulting water vapour go? What does it do? Are more clouds created, or fewer clouds? Do they warm or cool?

This post on Watts Up With That introduces and enhances a recent post on Climate Audit describing strong negative cloud feedbacks found by the Climate Process Team on Low-Latitude Cloud Feedbacks on Climate Sensitivity.

I especially like, as does Anthony Watts, the remarks of the first of Steve’s commenters, Willis Eschenbach:

Cloud positive feedback is one of the most foolish and anti-common sense claims of the models.

This is particularly true of cumulus and cumulonimbus, which increase with the temperature during the day, move huge amounts of energy from the surface aloft, reflect huge amounts of energy to space, and fade away and disappear at night.

I love the stunning picture of cumulonimbus on WUWT and the clarifying diagrams he gives to help us understand. Who can fail to notice that a cloud is not simply a cloud, but an ever-changing expression of shifting forces?

Richard Treadgold
Categories
Global warming
Tags
Climate Audit, Clouds, Global warming, Watts Up With That
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Nuclear-free, are we? Global thermostat — too good to be true? »

One Response to “Clouding the issue”

  1. Climate Conversation Group »  Humans to blame for climate change!  Yeah, right.  says:
    March 7, 2010 at 1:20 am

    [...] they know, as Dr Roy Spencer has said, that a sustained change of only about 1% in cloud cover is enough to create a Medieval Warm Period [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Thanks to WordShine for hosting our site:
   WordShine for polished writing
   WordShine to say what you mean
   Do you need FastProof?

Hot off the press

  • Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Oil prices are still down
  • No treaty, no ETS
  • Retirement of Huntly power generator
  • Oil prices down as Europe staggers
  • … is sauce for the gander
  • The end of scepticism
  • State of the science
  • Reflections on a changing climate
  • The real climate deniers
  • Let us destroy those myths
  • Our world-leading ETS actually hikes hydro
  • Levitus rewarmed
  • NIWA’s data proves NZ warming halt
  • Well, where’s your evidence, Renowden?
  • Deadly effective manipulation
  • Even an oik has freedoms
  • Climate Conversation v. Hot Topic et al.
  • It’s not so easy to ignore your friends
  • Yet again: climate scepticism is founded on facts, not faith

Latest comments

  • Alexander K on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Andy on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Marian on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Clarence Kay on Retirement of Huntly power generator
  • Clarence Kay on No treaty, no ETS
  • Jim McK on No treaty, no ETS
  • Huub Bakker on No treaty, no ETS
  • Anthropogenic Global Cooling on State of the science
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • bulaman on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Jim McK on No treaty, no ETS
  • PeterM on No treaty, no ETS
  • Bob D on State of the science
  • Anthropogenic Global Cooling on State of the science
  • Mike Jowsey on No treaty, no ETS

PayPal Tip Jar
To support what we do here,
please drop us a tiny tip. Thank you!

Thank you


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General links Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels UK United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence World government

Admin

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

June 2009
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Previous posts

Oil prices

StatCounter

 
StatCounter
hits
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox