Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • News releases
    • February 8, 2010
    • December 20, 2010
  • Climate Realists
    • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
    • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
    • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
    • Newsletter #4 2011
  • Files
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Nick says “nothing”

Richard Treadgold | September 26, 2009

We’ve just received a reply from the Hon Dr Nick Smith, Minister for Climate Change Issues, who answers the question in my original letter: “What do we get for something that will cost our families from $30 to $112 each and every week?”

He says we’ll get nothing for it. It won’t even affect the climate — it’s just our “fair share” of a “global effort” (both letters are here, see mine above, Nick’s below).

So the average family will pay perhaps $60 or more per week just to signal to our trading partners and incoming tourists that we’re doing “our bit”. Terrific — $60 a week for a better image. I guess it’s commercially important to stay in the club with our trading partners, but that’s a helluva lot for struggling householders to pay.

He expresses far too little concern for the economic problems of his citizens than I care for. His gaze is on other things and the people are coming last.

Nick tries to blame overseas influences for the costs to be faced by Kiwi households. He says: “Costs to households will mainly result from the international price on carbon and will pass through to New Zealanders” via a modified ETS. You can read his entire letter (pdf, 63KB) if you like.

Categories
Global warming
Tags
Climate Conversation Group, ETS, Global warming, New Zealand, Politics, Taxation
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Bias or Blindness… de Freitas lets fly SckSckSck campaign »

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Thanks to WordShine for hosting our site:
   WordShine for polished writing
   WordShine to say what you mean
   Do you need FastProof?

Hot off the press

  • Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Oil prices are still down
  • No treaty, no ETS
  • Retirement of Huntly power generator
  • Oil prices down as Europe staggers
  • … is sauce for the gander
  • The end of scepticism
  • State of the science
  • Reflections on a changing climate
  • The real climate deniers
  • Let us destroy those myths
  • Our world-leading ETS actually hikes hydro
  • Levitus rewarmed
  • NIWA’s data proves NZ warming halt
  • Well, where’s your evidence, Renowden?
  • Deadly effective manipulation
  • Even an oik has freedoms
  • Climate Conversation v. Hot Topic et al.
  • It’s not so easy to ignore your friends
  • Yet again: climate scepticism is founded on facts, not faith

Latest comments

  • Alexander K on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Andy on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Marian on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Clarence Kay on Retirement of Huntly power generator
  • Clarence Kay on No treaty, no ETS
  • Jim McK on No treaty, no ETS
  • Huub Bakker on No treaty, no ETS
  • Anthropogenic Global Cooling on State of the science
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • bulaman on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Jim McK on No treaty, no ETS
  • PeterM on No treaty, no ETS
  • Bob D on State of the science
  • Anthropogenic Global Cooling on State of the science
  • Mike Jowsey on No treaty, no ETS

PayPal Tip Jar
To support what we do here,
please drop us a tiny tip. Thank you!

Thank you


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General links Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels UK United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence World government

Admin

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

September 2009
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Previous posts

Oil prices

StatCounter

 
StatCounter
hits
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox