Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • News releases
    • February 8, 2010
    • December 20, 2010
  • Climate Realists
    • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
    • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
    • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
    • Newsletter #4 2011
  • Files
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Climategate Part 1 – 2,000-page epic of science and scepticism

Guest author | December 22, 2009

This summary from the National Post of the Climategate emails and what has been discovered in them is the best I have seen. It is especially pleasing to hear Terence Corcoran’s moderate tone. The contents of the released emails and computer code throw strong doubt on the conclusions of the science of global warming. Everything needs further examination and there are signs this re-examination is happening, in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the USA, Britain and Russia. — Richard Treadgold

First published at the National Post: December 18, 2009, 8:13 PM

The scientists seem to have become captive to the IPCC’s objectives

By Terence Corcoran

Now that the Copenhagen political games are out of the way, marked as a failure by any realistic standard, it may be time to move on to the science games. To get the post-Copenhagen science review under way, the world has a fine document at hand: The Climategate Papers.

On Nov. 17, three weeks before the Copenhagen talks began, a massive cache of climate science emails landed on a Russian server, reportedly after having been laundered through Saudi Arabia. Where they came from, nobody yet knows. Described as having been hacked or leaked from the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, the emails have been the focus of thousands of media and blog reports. Since their release, most attention has been focussed on a few choice bits of what seem like incriminating evidence of trickery and scientific repression. Some call it fraud.

Email fragments instantly began flying through the blogosphere. Perhaps the most sensational came from a Nov. 16, 1999, email from Phil Jones, head of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), in which he referred to having “completed Mike’s Nature trick” to “hide the decline” in temperature.

Direct evidence of scientific skulduggery

These words, now famous around the world as the core of Climategate, are in fact the grossest possible over-simplification of what the emails contain. The Phil Jones email and other choice email fragments are really just microscopic particles taken from a massive collection of material that will, in time, come to be seen as the greatest and most dramatic science policy epic in history.

Whether the emails, containing more than 2,000 pages and links to thousands more, are smoking guns and direct evidence of scientific skulduggery is in many ways a secondary issue. The Climategate emails are an unprecedented and unparalleled record of attempts by scientists to crack the mysteries of the world’s climate. They are at the heart of a massive effort to understand the world’s climate history and create models and systems to predict climate hundreds of years into the future. Read more… »

Comments
No Comments »
Categories
Global warming
Tags
AGW, Climate research, CRU leak, Global warming, IPCC, Keith Briffa, Michael Mann, Scientists
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

Thanks to WordShine for hosting our site:
   WordShine for polished writing
   WordShine to say what you mean
   Do you need FastProof?

Hot off the press

  • Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Oil prices are still down
  • No treaty, no ETS
  • Retirement of Huntly power generator
  • Oil prices down as Europe staggers
  • … is sauce for the gander
  • The end of scepticism
  • State of the science
  • Reflections on a changing climate
  • The real climate deniers
  • Let us destroy those myths
  • Our world-leading ETS actually hikes hydro
  • Levitus rewarmed
  • NIWA’s data proves NZ warming halt
  • Well, where’s your evidence, Renowden?
  • Deadly effective manipulation
  • Even an oik has freedoms
  • Climate Conversation v. Hot Topic et al.
  • It’s not so easy to ignore your friends
  • Yet again: climate scepticism is founded on facts, not faith

Latest comments

  • Alexander K on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Andy on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Marian on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Clarence Kay on Retirement of Huntly power generator
  • Clarence Kay on No treaty, no ETS
  • Jim McK on No treaty, no ETS
  • Huub Bakker on No treaty, no ETS
  • Anthropogenic Global Cooling on State of the science
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • bulaman on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Jim McK on No treaty, no ETS
  • PeterM on No treaty, no ETS
  • Bob D on State of the science
  • Anthropogenic Global Cooling on State of the science
  • Mike Jowsey on No treaty, no ETS

PayPal Tip Jar
To support what we do here,
please drop us a tiny tip. Thank you!

Thank you


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General links Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels UK United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence World government

Admin

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

December 2009
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Previous posts

Oil prices

StatCounter

 
StatCounter
hits
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox