<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salinger&#8217;s adjusted data now online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/salingers-adjusted-data-now-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/salingers-adjusted-data-now-online/</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Treadgold</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/salingers-adjusted-data-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-20772</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=1743#comment-20772</guid>
		<description>Please see your email inbox for our reply, Tore. For others wanting the station IDs: we&#039;re describing our methods to accompany the list of stations and it&#039;ll be posted in, hopefully, a few days. We&#039;re most anxious that people know exactly what we&#039;ve done, otherwise they will find it impossible to replicate our results, even with the station list. Once we&#039;ve published our methods, we&#039;ll all have the same understanding and then the criticism can begin in earnest. Which we welcome! Thanks for your enquiry, Tore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please see your email inbox for our reply, Tore. For others wanting the station IDs: we&#8217;re describing our methods to accompany the list of stations and it&#8217;ll be posted in, hopefully, a few days. We&#8217;re most anxious that people know exactly what we&#8217;ve done, otherwise they will find it impossible to replicate our results, even with the station list. Once we&#8217;ve published our methods, we&#8217;ll all have the same understanding and then the criticism can begin in earnest. Which we welcome! Thanks for your enquiry, Tore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tore Olafsen</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/salingers-adjusted-data-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-20771</link>
		<dc:creator>Tore Olafsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=1743#comment-20771</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,
Is it possible to get the monthly temperature readings from each of the stations (raw data)?
I am curious about possible differences in the seasonal variation between the stations and its effect on local trends, the anomaly calculation and the long term trend.  

Regards

Tore Olafsen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,<br />
Is it possible to get the monthly temperature readings from each of the stations (raw data)?<br />
I am curious about possible differences in the seasonal variation between the stations and its effect on local trends, the anomaly calculation and the long term trend.  </p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Tore Olafsen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

