Comments on: Caustic criticism as Jo Nova badgers The Australian

By: Richard C (NZ)

Richard C (NZ) — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:40:06 +0000

Graham Lloyd, Environment editor The Australian, defends the papers position:-

Robert Manne in denial of his own set of rules

“More offensive is Manne’s judgment that readers of a serious newspaper cannot be trusted with exposure to the alternative viewpoints of contrarians.”

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/robert-manne-in-denial-of-his-own-set-of-rules/story-e6frg996-1226138325105

Deltoid cheers on Manne:-

Robert Manne vs The Australian

http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2011/09/robert_manne_vs_the_australian.php?utm_source=networkbanner&utm_medium=link

By: Richard C (NZ)

Richard C (NZ) — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:51:53 +0000

Hopefully, Joanne will take on the Sydney Morning Herald’s “Environment” section after she has finished with The Australian e.g. this in “Climate Change”: “Newspaper wages campaign against climate change science”

The “Newspaper” being (ironically), The Australian.

By: Richard C (NZ)

Richard C (NZ) — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:40:18 +0000

It must grate on you Dubius, that JoNova not only PROVIDES the balance to an otherwise one-sided debate (as does this and every other CAGW-sceptical blog) but it also provides the science (as do the comments – not everyone is fooled) that debunks CAGW bogosity.

By: Dubius

Dubius — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:39:43 +0000

Laugh! Jo Nova ranting about balance. Perhaps she should take a look at her own blog.