Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • Home
  • Newsletter
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • News releases
    • February 8, 2010
  • Climate Realists
    • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
    • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
    • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
  • Carbon Sense
    • Newsletter Feb 15, 2010
  • Files
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About
    • New address
  • Contact

Old lessons good lessons

Richard Treadgold | January 8, 2010 | 12:28 am
Dear Sir, A friend of mine in New England has a neighbour who has received a Government cheque for 1,000 dollars this year for not raising hogs. So my friend now wants to go into the business himself, he not being very prosperous just now. He says, in fact, that the idea of not raising hogs appeals to him very strongly. Of course, he will need a hired man, and that is where I come in. I write to you as to your opinion of the best kind of farm not to raise hogs on, the best strain of hogs not to raise and how best to keep an inventory of hogs you are not raising. Also, do you think capital could be raised by issuance of a non-hog raising gold bond? The friend who got the 1,000 dollars got it for not raising 500 hogs. Now, we figure we might easily not raise 1,500 or 2,000 hogs, so you see the possible profits are only limited by the number of hogs we do not raise.

The letter below surfaced in an email group today (on the right is its earliest incarnation). It’s creative writing and, if you’re in a good mood when you read it, finely stimulating, even hilarious.

But I was moved to investigate. Google gave several recent references, the earliest was May 7, 2006. I kept looking; there are a score of references dated December 2009.

Then, on a blog from Quite Interesting Ltd (www.qi.com), came word it was from 1982. The writer traces it back from 2006 to an entry in Hansard in October 1994. I urge you to take a look; the story is interesting enough, to be sure.

The matter has by now quite fastened on our writer’s imagination and he presses his investigation on and on, discovering it on both sides of the Atlantic and in ever earlier decades. Eventually he turns it up, almost fully formed, in 1935, with beginnings in Hansard, no less, in a shipping context, in 1934!

Old or new, early or late, it contains elementary economics lessons for ever. Not to mention some of the driest British (or American) humour you’ll find anywhere.


NIGEL JOHNSON-HILL, PARKFARM, MILLAND, LIPHOOK GU30 7JT

Rt Hon David Miliband MP
Secretary of State.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA),
Nobel House
17 Smith Square
London
SW1P 3JR

16 July 2009

Dear Secretary of State,

My friend, who is in farming at the moment, recently received a cheque for £3,000 from the Rural Payments Agency for not rearing pigs. I would now like to join the “not rearing pigs” business.

In your opinion, what is the best kind of farm not to rear pigs on, and which is the best breed of pigs not to rear? I want to be sure I approach this endeavour in keeping with all government policies, as dictated by the EU under the Common Agricultural Policy.

I would prefer not to rear bacon pigs, but if this is not the type you want not rearing, I will just as gladly not rear porkers. Are there any advantages in not rearing rare breeds such as Saddlebacks or Gloucester Old Spots, or are there too many people already not rearing these?

As I see it, the hardest part of this programme will be keeping an accurate record of how many pigs I haven’t reared. Are there any Government or Local Authority courses on this?

My friend is very satisfied with this business. He has been rearing pigs for forty years or so, and the best he ever made on them was £1,422 in 1968. That is – until this year, when he received a cheque for not rearing any.

If I get £3,000 for not rearing 50 pigs, will I get £6,000 for not rearing 100? I plan to operate on a small scale at first, holding myself down to about 4,000 pigs not raised, which will mean about £240,000 for the first year. As I become more expert in not rearing pigs, I plan to be more ambitious, perhaps increasing to, say, 40,000 pigs not reared in my second year, for which I should expect about £2.4 million from your department. Incidentally, I wonder if I would be eligible to receive tradable carbon credits for all these pigs not producing harmful and polluting methane gases?

Another point: These pigs that I plan not to rear will not eat 2,000 tonnes of cereals. I understand that you also pay farmers for not growing crops. Will I qualify for payments for not growing cereals to not feed the pigs I don’t rear?

I am also considering the “not milking cows” business, so please send any information you have on that too. Please could you also include the current Defra advice on set aside fields? Can this be done on an e-commerce basis with virtual fields (of which I seem to have several thousand hectares)?

In view of the above you will realise that I will be totally unemployed, and will therefore qualify for unemployment benefits. I shall of course be voting for your party at the next general election.
Yours faithfully,

Nigel Johnson-Hill

Categories
Economics
Tags
Farming, Humour, not rearing pigs business, Urban myths
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« WordPress upgrade — sorry NIWA guilty of propaganda posing as science »

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

 

Thanks to WordShine for hosting our site. Professional editing services and academic editing — WordShine for polished writing.

Hot off the press

  • Climate panel must be purged
  • Lincoln – a comedy of errors
  • NZ Herald ratifies outrageous rant
  • AGW a cloak for dishonest science
  • Meltdown of the climate ‘consensus’
  • To do good, the free will be bound
  • Auckland warming is deception
  • Rudman offensive but NZ temp record dubious
  • A tale of two hemispheres
  • A swelling debate — Chris has questions

Latest comments

  • Andy on Climate panel must be purged
  • Quentin F on Climate panel must be purged
  • Andy on Climate panel must be purged
  • Andy on Lincoln – a comedy of errors
  • klem on Climate panel must be purged
  • Richard Treadgold on Meltdown of the climate ‘consensus’
  • Clarence on Lincoln – a comedy of errors
  • Richard Treadgold on Lincoln – a comedy of errors
  • Richard Treadgold on Auckland warming is deception
  • Quentin F on Meltdown of the climate ‘consensus’
  • Richard Treadgold on NZ Herald ratifies outrageous rant
  • Quentin F on Lincoln – a comedy of errors
  • Mike Jowsey on Lincoln – a comedy of errors
  • (not so) Silent on Auckland warming is deception
  • Richard Treadgold on Auckland warming is deception

Tags

ACT Activists Administration AGW Air temperature Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading Climate Conversation Group Climate Depot Climate profiteering Climate research Climate Science Climate Skeptic Clouds CRU leak Data quality Disproving AGW Energy supply ETS Glaciers Global warming Hot Topic Injustice IPCC Joanne Nova New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Peter Gluckman Peter Spencer Rajendra Pachauri Rodney Hide Royal Society Roy Spencer Sceptics Science bias Science funding UK Watts Up With That Wind turbines

Categories

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
What's your opinion?
Stop the ETS — is it madness? Should we stop the ETS?
sckscksck — is the earth warming dangerously from human activities?
Your view of CO2 — does CO2 dominate the climate?
Exercise your word skills — what's the best collective noun for icebergs?

Big Button email campaign

email button

Stop the ETS

Press this Little Button. Read the article. Press the Big Button to set up an email to the Prime Minister. Change the email address to send the message to your local MP or Nick Smith or anyone. Change the message if you like! Add your name! Click Send!
Click to get your own widget

Interested in oil prices?

Scroll down to see a nifty little widget that graphs oil prices back five years.

Climate change links

  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Global warming at a glance
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Watts Up With That

 

January 2010
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Blog stats

page loads since August 2008

Previous posts

Oil price trends

 
 

"Your word is no longer enough, sir; you must give evidence. Without it, why should we bear you? If it is the least you give, it is all you have."

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox