<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have human activities increased CO2?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/have-human-activities-increased-co2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/have-human-activities-increased-co2/</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarence</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/have-human-activities-increased-co2/comment-page-1/#comment-21789</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=4883#comment-21789</guid>
		<description>This is a &quot;plain fact&quot; in the same way that the Royal Society&#039;s take on the mathematics of global warming is &quot;simple physics&quot;.

The paper surely can&#039;t mean that water vapour is an inactive greenhouse gas. But as the bulk of Professor Hunter&#039;s AGW &quot;evidence&quot; is focused on fossil fuels, he probably means this statement to be limited to carbon dioxide. Even then, it is not immediately obvious that an increase from 0.022% to 0.028% should be described as &quot;significant&quot;.

The greenhouse gases of greatest concern to New Zealand are methane and nitrous oxide. The concentration of atmospheric methane raced upwards in the eighteenth century, then plateaued during the huge population increases of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It spiked upwards in the 1990s and then went flat for a decade. There is no reason to assume any of these gyrations had anything to do with human activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a &#8220;plain fact&#8221; in the same way that the Royal Society&#8217;s take on the mathematics of global warming is &#8220;simple physics&#8221;.</p>
<p>The paper surely can&#8217;t mean that water vapour is an inactive greenhouse gas. But as the bulk of Professor Hunter&#8217;s AGW &#8220;evidence&#8221; is focused on fossil fuels, he probably means this statement to be limited to carbon dioxide. Even then, it is not immediately obvious that an increase from 0.022% to 0.028% should be described as &#8220;significant&#8221;.</p>
<p>The greenhouse gases of greatest concern to New Zealand are methane and nitrous oxide. The concentration of atmospheric methane raced upwards in the eighteenth century, then plateaued during the huge population increases of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It spiked upwards in the 1990s and then went flat for a decade. There is no reason to assume any of these gyrations had anything to do with human activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

