<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Housekeeping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C (NZ)</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-31550</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C (NZ)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-31550</guid>
		<description>Richard T.

Now that you have settled on a constant CCG style and Open Threads is working, can some of those comments (mostly mine) at the top of  &quot;Open threads as promised&quot; be deleted now that they are no longer relevant?

Everything above Vals comment here could go perhaps.

http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/open-threads-as-promised/#comment-25928</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard T.</p>
<p>Now that you have settled on a constant CCG style and Open Threads is working, can some of those comments (mostly mine) at the top of  &#8220;Open threads as promised&#8221; be deleted now that they are no longer relevant?</p>
<p>Everything above Vals comment here could go perhaps.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/open-threads-as-promised/#comment-25928" rel="nofollow">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/open-threads-as-promised/#comment-25928</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-25748</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-25748</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m still catching up with all the things you’ve been writing about and I’m still looking for an appropriate theme&quot;

BLOCKS2 seems to capture the essence and nature of &quot;Climate CONVERSATIONS Group&quot; perhaps a little better than the previous normal one did (IMHO).

Maybe it&#039;s better to leave the ID#-only theme to JoNova where it works perfectly there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m still catching up with all the things you’ve been writing about and I’m still looking for an appropriate theme&#8221;</p>
<p>BLOCKS2 seems to capture the essence and nature of &#8220;Climate CONVERSATIONS Group&#8221; perhaps a little better than the previous normal one did (IMHO).</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s better to leave the ID#-only theme to JoNova where it works perfectly there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-25736</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-25736</guid>
		<description>&quot;P.S. I’d still like to give an ID # sequence theme (as Jo Nova) a trial run (if that’s possible and you’ve got the inclination) using an Open Thread post to make a comparison of the relative utility of discussion – PLEASE but no rush.&quot;

RT, it&#039;s just occurred to me (Duh!), that you might not be able to employ an ID#-only theme just for one trial post without changing the theme for the ENTIRE Blog.

If there is the facility to set an ID#-only themed trial post while leaving the rest of the Blog as is, fine. But if not, changing all the previous posts will stuff up the EXCELLENT and VERY USEFUL resource that has developed.

I&#039;m sorry to send you on a wild goose chase (perhaps) but my minds been on other things and housekeeping doesn&#039;t always get the attention it deserves.

Have not encountered any problems using BLOCKS2 for discussion, but it could get very tiresome if the #83 (14:01) - #91 (22:10) thread gets technical in a CA way (probably wont but you never know).

Change has been good so far IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;P.S. I’d still like to give an ID # sequence theme (as Jo Nova) a trial run (if that’s possible and you’ve got the inclination) using an Open Thread post to make a comparison of the relative utility of discussion – PLEASE but no rush.&#8221;</p>
<p>RT, it&#8217;s just occurred to me (Duh!), that you might not be able to employ an ID#-only theme just for one trial post without changing the theme for the ENTIRE Blog.</p>
<p>If there is the facility to set an ID#-only themed trial post while leaving the rest of the Blog as is, fine. But if not, changing all the previous posts will stuff up the EXCELLENT and VERY USEFUL resource that has developed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry to send you on a wild goose chase (perhaps) but my minds been on other things and housekeeping doesn&#8217;t always get the attention it deserves.</p>
<p>Have not encountered any problems using BLOCKS2 for discussion, but it could get very tiresome if the #83 (14:01) &#8211; #91 (22:10) thread gets technical in a CA way (probably wont but you never know).</p>
<p>Change has been good so far IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-25693</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-25693</guid>
		<description>&quot;The aim then is for a headline to be picked up in the Google News, climate science section and until we do, we don’t rate..&quot;

Or somewhere else in the Blogosphere.

Headline:-

Climate Wars: Climate Conversations vs Hot Topic.

&lt;em&gt;The battle lines are drawn......yada yada&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The aim then is for a headline to be picked up in the Google News, climate science section and until we do, we don’t rate..&#8221;</p>
<p>Or somewhere else in the Blogosphere.</p>
<p>Headline:-</p>
<p>Climate Wars: Climate Conversations vs Hot Topic.</p>
<p><em>The battle lines are drawn&#8230;&#8230;yada yada</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-25692</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-25692</guid>
		<description>And I DO like the way the boxed thread stops getting narrow at a decent width when the &quot;Reply&quot; button disappears.

VERY NICE,  as opposed to HT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I DO like the way the boxed thread stops getting narrow at a decent width when the &#8220;Reply&#8221; button disappears.</p>
<p>VERY NICE,  as opposed to HT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-25673</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-25673</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think perhaps the blue background is too dark (not enough text-background contrast).&quot;

Perhaps not now that I&#039;ve adjusted to it

&quot;although 1 1/2 spacing might be better – seems very dense&quot;

Also, perhaps not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think perhaps the blue background is too dark (not enough text-background contrast).&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps not now that I&#8217;ve adjusted to it</p>
<p>&#8220;although 1 1/2 spacing might be better – seems very dense&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, perhaps not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-25663</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-25663</guid>
		<description>The wider format has fixed some CR problems I had in a comment Oct 12th, 2010 at 10:14 #5?

The normal theme with narrower boxes gave me grief in that respect - the new wider blocks are definitely better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wider format has fixed some CR problems I had in a comment Oct 12th, 2010 at 10:14 #5?</p>
<p>The normal theme with narrower boxes gave me grief in that respect &#8211; the new wider blocks are definitely better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-25660</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-25660</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m &quot;warming&quot; (Ha!) to the new theme.

It seems easier to find sub-threads.

You could ditch the comment ID #&#039;s (if that&#039;s possible). They&#039;re useless if they reset with each comment insertion.

Boxes and ID #&#039;s are incompatible.

It&#039;s either:- Boxes OR ID # sequence, NOT both IMO

P.S. I&#039;d still like to give an ID # sequence theme (as Jo Nova) a trial run (if that&#039;s possible and you&#039;ve got the inclination) using an Open Thread post to make a comparison of the relative utility of discussion - PLEASE but no rush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m &#8220;warming&#8221; (Ha!) to the new theme.</p>
<p>It seems easier to find sub-threads.</p>
<p>You could ditch the comment ID #&#8217;s (if that&#8217;s possible). They&#8217;re useless if they reset with each comment insertion.</p>
<p>Boxes and ID #&#8217;s are incompatible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s either:- Boxes OR ID # sequence, NOT both IMO</p>
<p>P.S. I&#8217;d still like to give an ID # sequence theme (as Jo Nova) a trial run (if that&#8217;s possible and you&#8217;ve got the inclination) using an Open Thread post to make a comparison of the relative utility of discussion &#8211; PLEASE but no rush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-25654</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-25654</guid>
		<description>I find being presented with Rodney&#039;s smiling face every time after submitting a comment a little unsettling but I guess we will eventually move on to a new post and that it is not a feature of the new theme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find being presented with Rodney&#8217;s smiling face every time after submitting a comment a little unsettling but I guess we will eventually move on to a new post and that it is not a feature of the new theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/housekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-25637</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7095#comment-25637</guid>
		<description>Something else I think is different is that the reply box stays in the thread box instead of dropping down to the last comment.

So there is no need to scroll back and forth. I don&#039;t think that happened in the normal theme.

That feature is VERY NICE if a boxed sub- thread scheme is used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else I think is different is that the reply box stays in the thread box instead of dropping down to the last comment.</p>
<p>So there is no need to scroll back and forth. I don&#8217;t think that happened in the normal theme.</p>
<p>That feature is VERY NICE if a boxed sub- thread scheme is used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

