Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

More proof global temps lag SOI

Richard Treadgold | January 10, 2011
SOI forecast January 2011

Bryan Leyland’s latest graph (January 2011) showing the implied SOI forecast (thick pink line) of global temperatures for late 2010. Click for larger version.

NIWA, listen to this, it’s amazing

UPDATE 1, 11 JAN 2011, 09:30 NZDT

On December 1 last year, we wrote about Bryan Leyland’s prediction of significant cooling before the end of the year coming true. You can see from the chart exactly what happened. Not only that, it would appear that the temperature has not finished going down yet.

This remarkable forecast, now some eight months old, comes out of a 2009 paper showing a lagged correlation between global temperatures and the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), calculated from fluctuations in the air pressure difference between Tahiti and Darwin, and indicative also of the start (and the state) of a La Nina (as now) or an El Nino. This correlation is a lot more convincing than comparing global temperature with CO2 levels!

Bryan Leyland

Bryan Leyland.

Leyland’s latest prediction

What is remarkable about this is that a retired engineer in New Zealand, armed only with Excel and the paper by McLean et al., was able to make this prediction and publish it on the Internet. Why did the “climate scientists” fail in this? They said nothing about end-of-year cooling, predicting instead that 2010 would be the hottest year ever! It wasn’t, but it was only marginally cooler than 1998.

Bryan now makes another prediction: world temperatures will remain cool until June at least. Whether or not this is the beginning of long-term cooling induced by sunspots (or anything else) remains to be seen.

SOI highest December value ever recorded

But there is no doubt that the present La Nina is intense. According to the Australian BoM ENSO Wrap-Up web page, “The Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) value for December of +27 is the highest December SOI value on record, as well as being the highest value for any month since November 1973.” These seem to indicate we’re in for at least several months of cooling.

Here’s a longer-term look at the astonishing lagged correlation between global temperature and the SOI. Why hasn’t anyone else noticed this?

longer-term SOI v. global temperature

A longer view showing the remarkable correlation between global temperatures and the SOI. Click for larger version.

UPDATE 1, 11 JAN 2011, 09:30 a.m. NZDT

Joanne Nova has an interesting post on this global temperature prediction. She also reminds us that the SOI trace is inverted, as well as being pushed seven months into the future.

Categories
General
Tags
Air temperature, Air temperature, Bryan Leyland, Climate research, Global temperature, John McLean, SOI
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Computer model is not evidence Green power generates red ink »

8 Responses to “More proof global temps lag SOI”

  1. Bob D says:
    January 11, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    The current La Nina is predicted (by NOAA) to last through the SH winter. This means we can probably expect globally cooler conditions for almost a year, because of the lag.

    Reply
  2. Richard C (NZ) says:
    January 11, 2011 at 5:05 pm

    But I thought (as Doug Mackie puts it at HT)-

    But as an example of successful whacking I would like to cite the case of the McLean, de Freitas and Carter paper. It was shot down mercilessly. Now I’m not great frequenter of the denialosphere but I have formed the impression that this work is not often cited now that anyone can easily post links to solid refudiations.

    Note the Sarah Palin vernacular.

    Reply
  3. Clarence says:
    January 13, 2011 at 10:16 pm

    In climate science, it is unknown to predict an outcome of a particular hypothesis and accept that its truth will stand or fall on whether the prediction turns out to be correct.

    Instead, climate scientists “project” future outcomes based on storylines which are improbable but which can’t be disproved by results until all contemporaries are dead.

    Reply
    • Richard Treadgold says:
      January 13, 2011 at 10:26 pm

      Goodness, Clarence, are you suggesting that some scientists might disregard this negation of the dangerous anthropogenic global warming theory?

      Now, just what the gosh-darn was that theory, anyways?

      Reply
  4. val majkus says:
    January 16, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    Warwick Hughes http://www.warwickhughes.com/blog/?p=780#more-780 has a Guest article by Pat Frank
    Dr Frank says
    We’ve all read the diagnosis, for example here, that the global climate has suffered “unprecedented warming,” since about 1900. The accepted increase across the 20th century is 0.7 (+/-)0.2 C. As an experimental chemist, I always wondered at that “(+/-)0.2 C.” In my experience, it seemed an awfully narrow uncertainty, given the exigencies of instruments and outdoor measurements. I did a study which led to the paper that is just out in Energy and Environment [5]. Here’s the title and the abstract:

    Title: “Uncertainty in the Global Average Surface Air Temperature Index: A Representative Lower Limit”
    (abstract follows and conclusion)
    This lower limit of instrumental uncertainty implies that Earth’s fever is indistinguishable from zero Celsius, at the 1σ level, across the entire 20th century.

    Reply
  5. val majkus says:
    January 16, 2011 at 12:25 pm

    There’s a link in a comment to the above article by Geoff Sherrington
    to http://www.geoffstuff.com/Jane%20Warne%20thermometry%20Broadmeadows.pdf
    A Preliminary Investigation of Temperature Screen Design and Their
    Impacts on Temperature Measurements

    Reply
  6. Andy says:
    January 17, 2011 at 8:19 am

    Joe Bastardi is on a similar theme here: (video)

    http://www.accuweather.com/video.asp?channel=vblog_bastardi

    Reply
  7. McLean’s folly and the climate clueless says:
    November 30, 2011 at 11:05 pm

    [...] member Bryan Leyland used this to “predict” a coming cooling, which was lapped up by the usual suspects. In January this year, Leyland predicted cooling would continue until at least June. Now McLean has [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?
  • Snip-it

Latest comments

  • Andy on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard Treadgold on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Andy on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard Treadgold on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Andy on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard Treadgold on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • David on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • SimonP on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard Treadgold on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Andy on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • David on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard Treadgold on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Andy on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard Treadgold on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

January 2011
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox