Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Hone is a lovely man

Richard Treadgold | February 21, 2011
Hone Harawira

Hone Harawira. Doesn’t believe in global warming, apparently. yee ha

Well, I’m gobsmacked!

I’ve received a report that Hone Harawira has a redeeming feature.

It would seem that, among his many sins, he doesn’t believe in Global Warming, according to TV3 News this evening.

Well done, him; seems he’s not such a bad egg after all!

Categories
General
Tags
General, Hone Harawira, Humour
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Nick unmasks truth — climate is changing The uncertainties of averages »

16 Responses to “Hone is a lovely man”

  1. Andy says:
    February 22, 2011 at 8:22 am

    Hone is in many ways the archetypal heretic, so it maybe comes as no surprise that he doesn’t toe the party line on climate change.

    On a related subject, Frank Furedi writes a good piece in Spiked on intolerence in modern society (with particular reference to Sir John Beddington’s recent pronouncements)

    Only intellectual cowards demand ‘gross intolerance’

    The modern men of science who want to silence quacks are ironically on the same side as pre-Enlightenment religious dogmatists.

    http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10217/

    Reply
  2. Bob D says:
    February 22, 2011 at 8:50 am

    It would seem that, among his many sins, he doesn’t believe in Global Warming

    Well, that would then be his only redeeming feature.

    Reply
  3. Richard C (NZ) says:
    February 22, 2011 at 7:43 pm

    Did anyone see David Suzuki on TV1 just before 9am this morning?

    Not a lovely man. I can only describe him as a lying skunk.

    Right now he might be able to put his imaginary climate change in perspective in view of ChCh – but I doubt it.

    At least viewer numbers to his film will be down.

    Reply
  4. val majkus says:
    February 22, 2011 at 9:02 pm

    Richard and all my NZ friends whom I’ve met on this site – we in Australia are seeing the news of what happened in Christchurch
    the best of luck to you and yours and to everyone in Christchurch
    from Toowoomba and I’m sure all in Australia to whom NZ is a much cherished neighbour

    Reply
    • Bob D says:
      February 23, 2011 at 12:00 pm

      Thanks Val, it’s been a very horrific event. There are still people trapped, and we’re all hoping the rescuers can get to them in time. It seems Aus and NZ are in the wars at the moment.

      Reply
    • Andy says:
      February 23, 2011 at 5:57 pm

      Thanks Val.
      I managed to evacuate my family to south canterbury this morning. Christchurch is a real mess, but we, at least, are all glad to be safe and unharmed. Not so for everyone, sadly

      Reply
  5. QuentinF says:
    February 24, 2011 at 4:23 pm

    Latest news from Aussie. Carbon dioxide hater Gillard is now saying carbon tax coming in 2012!
    I though I had escaped it for now! dam.

    Reply
    • Andy says:
      February 24, 2011 at 4:43 pm

      I had a call from a friend in Canberra, checking on how I was after the earthquake.
      His wife works for the Green party. They are having an all expenses paid trip to London, spouses included.

      Who says that crime doesn’t pay?

      Reply
      • QuentinF says:
        February 25, 2011 at 12:15 pm

        HAHA thats about par for the course with these greens

        Reply
  6. Richard C (NZ) says:
    February 26, 2011 at 6:35 pm

    Earthquakes trump climate change hands down.

    143 dead and rising, NZ$10bn damage.

    All right now – not in 2100.

    Reply
    • Richard C (NZ) says:
      February 28, 2011 at 7:08 pm

      Update, $20bn. Climate change is nothing in comparison. An earthquake did $20bn damage in 1 minute and people are worried about something that MIGHT happen over the rest of the century. Time for some perspective.

      Reply
      • Andy says:
        February 28, 2011 at 8:20 pm

        The long term economic damage to the country from the quake hasn’t even started yet. Many people won’t be coming back to ChCh after this.

        Reply
      • John ONeill says:
        March 25, 2011 at 8:20 pm

        For some real perspective, last time carbon dioxide levels were at current levels, sea level was between 3 and 5 metres higher than now. That would permanently flood all the liquefaction prone parts of Christchurch, most of the tsunami hit area of Japan, and every other port and estuary. That makes a few years devastation to small regions look completely insignificant in comparison. That’s what we can expect without adding any more greenhouse gases, and without considering some other effects that could be even more serious.

        Reply
        • Richard Treadgold says:
          March 25, 2011 at 8:27 pm

          Are you saying that the present levels of CO2 will lead to sea level rising to between 3 and 5 metres higher than present? If you’re serious, do you have a reference for that proposition?

          Reply
        • Richard C (NZ) says:
          March 26, 2011 at 2:14 pm

          Thanks, you’ve just disproved any link between CO2 levels and sea level. If there was a link, much of the surrounding neighbourhood where I live would be under water right now.

          Reply
  7. Andy says:
    May 5, 2011 at 11:54 am

    Bin Laden a freedom fighter – Harawira

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10723505

    I don’t think there’s too much to love about Hone.
    If ever there was a reason to dump MMP, here it is.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?
  • Snip-it
  • Forget prosperity, we need the extra tree
  • Snip-it
  • NZ warming to soar and slump
  • Simple arithmetic
  • Miffed Michele mangles Monckton meeting

Latest comments

  • realityrulesok on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on News
  • Richard C (NZ) on News
  • justintempler on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Simon on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • realityrulesok on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard Treadgold on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Mike Jowsey on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Mike Jowsey on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • realityrulesok on Renowden a scaring warmist

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

February 2011
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox