Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

I’m back. Thanks.

Richard Treadgold | May 27, 2011

When I told you I was unwell, what encouraging and inspiring things you said! Thank you, thank you.

I’m fine now, with just one small procedure left, to be done in a week or two. At least another 40 years must be possible!

Now, with a renewed sense of humility, to continue the fight…

Categories
General
Tags
Climate Conversation Group, Housekeeping, Personal
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Briefly in hospital The Economist adds earth-moving »

4 Responses to “I’m back. Thanks.”

  1. val majkus says:
    May 27, 2011 at 9:10 pm

    welcome back Richard; on sent your post to Warwick

    Reply
  2. Alexander K says:
    May 27, 2011 at 10:30 pm

    Good news, Richard! There are too few who are prepared to go the extra mile in pursuit of truth and knowledge, (and perhaps some entertainment along the way) so your return is very welcome.

    Reply
  3. Robin Pittwood says:
    May 27, 2011 at 10:49 pm

    Great. Very pleased to hear the news. Robin.

    Reply
  4. Andy says:
    May 28, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    Good to hear that you are back with us Richard.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?
  • Snip-it
  • Forget prosperity, we need the extra tree

Latest comments

  • Bob D on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard Treadgold on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Emotional knowledge
  • Bob D on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard Treadgold on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Robin Pittwood on Emotional knowledge
  • David on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Magoo on Emotional knowledge
  • Magoo on Emotional knowledge
  • Andy on Emotional knowledge
  • Richard C (NZ) on Emotional knowledge
  • Andy on Emotional knowledge
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard Treadgold on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Emotional knowledge
  • Richard C (NZ) on Climate porkies from TV One
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

May 2011
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox