<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perspective, raw and bleeding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/perspective-raw-and-bleeding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/perspective-raw-and-bleeding/</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthropogenic Global Cooling</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/perspective-raw-and-bleeding/comment-page-1/#comment-58882</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthropogenic Global Cooling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10023#comment-58882</guid>
		<description>Looks like Ken&#039;s parachute didn&#039;t open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Ken&#8217;s parachute didn&#8217;t open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Treadgold</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/perspective-raw-and-bleeding/comment-page-1/#comment-58800</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10023#comment-58800</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re a long way ahead, that&#039;s for sure, but there&#039;s more to Alexa&#039;s assessment than comparing hits. For instance, I know it includes incoming links, but I don&#039;t know their calculations; perhaps it&#039;s even proprietary. The numbers just rank a nation&#039;s web sites from most popular to least popular. Whether popular means more people or more high-quality people (by some mysterious measure) is impossible to say. But in this case, CC sits at 1100 and HT at 4113, so we&#039;re a lot closer to the front than they are.

But we&#039;re even well ahead of SciBlogs! Wow! If we were to apply for public funding, we might reach the stars!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re a long way ahead, that&#8217;s for sure, but there&#8217;s more to Alexa&#8217;s assessment than comparing hits. For instance, I know it includes incoming links, but I don&#8217;t know their calculations; perhaps it&#8217;s even proprietary. The numbers just rank a nation&#8217;s web sites from most popular to least popular. Whether popular means more people or more high-quality people (by some mysterious measure) is impossible to say. But in this case, CC sits at 1100 and HT at 4113, so we&#8217;re a lot closer to the front than they are.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;re even well ahead of SciBlogs! Wow! If we were to apply for public funding, we might reach the stars!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarence</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/perspective-raw-and-bleeding/comment-page-1/#comment-58778</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10023#comment-58778</guid>
		<description>Does this mean that your blog receives 4 times as many hits as Hot Topic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean that your blog receives 4 times as many hits as Hot Topic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

