<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our CO2 emissions are not the half of it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/our-co2-emissions-are-not-the-half-of-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/our-co2-emissions-are-not-the-half-of-it/</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:22:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarence Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/our-co2-emissions-are-not-the-half-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-67782</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 02:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11584#comment-67782</guid>
		<description>If (red) China was omitted from your top graph, the rest of the world would look remarkably flat.

&quot;Nature absorbs about 40% of our emissions&quot; is a bit light. The figures I&#039;ve seen wobble around between 50% and 55%.

Of course, it&#039;s always possible that Nature absorbs 100% of our emissions and that the poorly correlated atmospheric increase has some other natural cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If (red) China was omitted from your top graph, the rest of the world would look remarkably flat.</p>
<p>&#8220;Nature absorbs about 40% of our emissions&#8221; is a bit light. The figures I&#8217;ve seen wobble around between 50% and 55%.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s always possible that Nature absorbs 100% of our emissions and that the poorly correlated atmospheric increase has some other natural cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/our-co2-emissions-are-not-the-half-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-67691</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11584#comment-67691</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I’ve seen a couple of efforts around the internet, including at Sceptical Science, but I don’t automatically trust everything John Cook presents.&lt;/em&gt;

In case you don&#039;t know, things have been heating up a bit recently between John Cook&#039;s SkS and Bishop Hill, amongst others

http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2011/9/20/cooking-the-books.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I’ve seen a couple of efforts around the internet, including at Sceptical Science, but I don’t automatically trust everything John Cook presents.</em></p>
<p>In case you don&#8217;t know, things have been heating up a bit recently between John Cook&#8217;s SkS and Bishop Hill, amongst others</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2011/9/20/cooking-the-books.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2011/9/20/cooking-the-books.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

