Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Cheap, unlimited energy

Richard Treadgold | October 20, 2011
E-Cat demo module

Andrea Rossi’s energy catalyser. This is a demonstration module packed into a shipping container.

Mark Gibbs, at Forbes Magazine, introduces, with caution, the E-Cat process, invented by one Andrea Rossi.

This is a room-termperature fusion device, promising almost unlimited energy from relatively small amounts of nickel and hydrogen. Electricity could be produced in every suburb without the need of gigantic power stations, at so little cost it wouldn’t be sensible to meter it.

Some measurement data seem to be available from a demonstration.

An apparently public demonstration in the US planned for October 28 could produce more confirmation.

I hope it proves true and it’s not just another false alarm. H/T Michael Treadgold


UPDATE 1, 20 Oct 2011, 12:25 NZDT: There’s a long, rambling article about the inventor, Rossi, at Pure Energy Systems that includes a graph of machine temperatures and is followed by a bunch of links to articles covering the E-Cat.

Categories
Uncategorized
Tags
E-Cat, Energy, Energy supply, Fusion
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« NZ shale gas – will we get lucky? Trust in the IPCC »

11 Responses to “Cheap, unlimited energy”

  1. Andy says:
    October 20, 2011 at 11:59 am

    I’m always a bit sceptical of claims around Fusion.

    In my view, nuclear fission using Thorium (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor – LFTR) is the most promising looking technology.

    It has the promise of safety (passive cooling), unlimited fuel (Thorium is so abundant we will NEVER run out) and it almost completely burns the fuel.

    Kirk Sorensen is the man with a mission (and a company – Flibe Energy)
    Furthermore, the Chinese are starting serious R&D into Thorium.

    This video – Thorium Remix 2011 – LFTR in 5 minutes, gives the info (over nearly 2 hours).
    It also has some interesting comparisons with wind and solar.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9M__yYbsZ4

    Reply
  2. Andy says:
    October 20, 2011 at 12:28 pm

    The comments on this project on WUWT are pretty sceptical too.

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/04/andrea-rossis-e-cat-fusion-device-on-target/

    Reply
    • Huub Bakker says:
      October 21, 2011 at 5:43 am

      I would certainly be sceptical and I am but it’s one thing to scam people out of money for ‘research’ and another entirely to start selling 10MW units. If he’s right then we have two outcomes; cheap power and new physics.

      BTW I note that the ‘faster-than-light’ neutrinos have probably been explained using conventional physics but there were some intriguing comments about other physics. Apparently the Michelson-Morley experiment was flawed and a number of researchers over the last century have shown that there is an effect from the ‘ether.’ The size and direction are constant in an absolute frame of reference. Links in the comments of the WUWT article about the ftl neutrinos.

      Reply
  3. Richard C (NZ) says:
    October 20, 2011 at 3:30 pm

    If it’s economic, it will be proven. If it’s not, it will probably be subsidized by govts everywhere – now. A bit different back in the 70s and 80s it turns out.
    ******************************************************************************************************
    Rossi has been into alternative energy for many years. It was in the 1970s and 1980s that Rossi was busy building garbage disposal facilities that burned household garbage and utilized the recovered heat. During that period, he found out how to not only recover heat from burning garbage but also to turn garbage into fuel. His company, Petroldragon, had a valid garbage-to-fuel technology that could turn household waste into combustible oil, coal and gas. Production had started and reached some 20 tons of fuel oil a day in 1989, when corrupt bureaucrats started to attack.

    The first step was to tax his process just as if he was producing alcohol, making the resulting fuel ridiculously expensive. When he opposed the unjust tax, the next step was a challenge that proved more difficult: the bureaucrats asserted that the garbage stocked and ready to be transformed in his production facilities wasn’t raw material for his process but was an illegal and fraudulent attempt to hide and “treat toxic garbage” for which he had no license.

    Rossi was imprisoned on trumped up eco-charges for trying to produce an ecologically sustainable fuel that did not come from petroleum deposits, and after one of his companies was forced into bankruptcy, he was again imprisoned for not paying his creditors … great government support for alternative energy technologies, one might say. That whole sad story is well documented on Rossi’s website:

    * http://ingandrearossi.com/ – Rossi’s website gives his side of the saga of waste-to-energy problem. The beginning, the media boom around Petroldragon, plans for the future.

    http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Andrea_A._Rossi_Cold_Fusion_Generator
    ******************************************************************************************************]
    Plenty of garbage-to-fuel methane plants but I didn’t know of “a valid garbage-to-fuel technology that could turn household waste into combustible oil, coal and gas” except for human waste-to-oil:-

    Can human excrement solve the impending energy crisis?

    The human bottom seems like an unlikely answer to the world’s oil needs, but a group of South Island engineers say it has the potential to revolutionise the energy industry. Researchers plan to create crude oil from human waste and sewage treatment ponds, perhaps holding the key to solving the impending energy crisis.

    Read more: http://www.3news.co.nz/News/Canhumanpoosolvetheimpendingenergycrisis/tabid/209/articleID/72171/Default.aspx?ArticleID=72171#ixzz1bI6e4Cey

    Better start work on this – what’s for dinner?

    Reply
  4. Andy says:
    October 20, 2011 at 3:35 pm

    El Reg also has a piece on LFTR

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/01/china_thorium_bet/

    A private company founded by Kazuo Furukawa, designer of the Fuju reactor, called International Thorium Energy & Molen-Salt Technology Inc (iThEMS) aims to produce a small (10KW) reactor within five years. Furukawa is aiming for a retail price of 11 US cents per kWh (6.8p per kWh).

    Just to put that into perspective, the UK’s feed-in tariff ranges from 34.5p/kWh for a small wind turbine to 41.3p/kWh for a retro-fitted solar installation, making a personal LFTR much more attractive than an additional garage. Just tell them you’ve got an enormous solar panel.

    I kind of like the idea of a personal LFTR that is the size of a garage

    I wonder what the planning regs are like?

    Reply
  5. Andy says:
    October 20, 2011 at 3:51 pm

    By the way, I heard recently on Radio NZ (Simon Morton – this way up on Sats) a proposal to beam energy from the Moon back to Earth using a laser beam.

    The idea was so wacky I could hardly stop laughing. They were even proposing to use robots to mine the rare earths on the moon for the solar panels.

    Reply
  6. Andy says:
    October 21, 2011 at 9:10 am

    At the other end of the spectrum, we have this:

    £83m renewable energy power station gets Government green light

    The controversial £83 million straw-burning biomass facility, which had been opposed by local campaigners, can now be built at the former British Sugar site at Scawby Brook, near Brigg, after a Government-appointed planning inspector ruled in favour of developer Eco2

    Apart from the questionable practice of burning straw to make electricity, we have this in the comments on the article:

    Straw combustion presents special pollution concerns due to high chlorine content linked to creation of highly carcinogenic dioxin and furan hazard. I understand Drax pelleting process reduces chlorine content.
    The Gov produced a report in 2009 confirming use of biomass power would add £billions to annual health costs, this cost requires substantial upward revision following DECC March 2011 report allowing 50% increase in fine particle pollution from biomass combustion and trebling of NOX limit. The anticipated hazardous air pollution from this plant will equate to exhaust emissions from billions of additional diesel vehicle km in the locality.

    http://www.thisisscunthorpe.co.uk/pound-83m-renewable-energy-power-station-gets/story-13610318-detail/story.html

    Reply
  7. Andy says:
    October 22, 2011 at 6:36 pm

    Here’s some more crazy looking stuff

    A 2,600-foot tower planned for the Arizona desert will be the world’s second tallest structure and will be able to power 100,000 homes through hot air alone.

    The solar updraft tower, designed by EnviroMission, will work by collecting hot air as it rises from the heated ground surrounding it. The very tall, narrow tower increases the strength of the hot air flowing upward, where it will turn 32 turbines along the way.

    http://www.ecogeek.org/solar-power/3609-sky-scraping-tower-will-power-100000-homes-with-ho

    Reply
  8. Andy says:
    October 22, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    Meanwhile, back in the real world


    Offer a car at three times the price of a normal run-around, with the acceleration of a one-legged squirrel and the range of an inebriated slug, and what do you get?

    Well, despite the government offering £5,000 of our money to every idiot who is prepared to buy one (excluding the corporates who are using other people’s money), you end up selling just 308 models during the third quarter of the year. Just 465 electric vehicles were registered in the first quarter, and the number more than halved to 215 in the second.

    http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2011/10/limits-of-green.html

    Reply
  9. Richard C (NZ) says:
    October 29, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    Test of Rossi’s 1 MW E-Cat fusion system apparently successful

    Guest post by Ric Werme

    [...]

    Bottom line – the customer will buy the reactor. The only thing that looks like a data point is that it was producing 470kW with zero heating power in (self-sustain mode). Given that one metric for a successful test was to produce at least 6X the input power, it certainly passes that test!

    [...]

    …..please keep in mind this was not a science demonstration, not a public demonstration, but a step along the path to the first sale.

    Also, keep in mind what this isn’t – it’s not an efficient electrical power system. The output is hot water or low pressure steam. While that can be turned into electricity, thermodynamics says it can’t be very efficient. There are plenty of applications for this sort of process heat, and that makes a fine initial target market.

    >>>>>>>>

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/28/test-of-rossis-1-mw-e-cat-fusion-system-apparently-successful/

    Reply
  10. Harold Guy says:
    October 31, 2011 at 7:07 pm

    Richard C’s post is on the money. Another day has past, and more reports are in about Rossi’s latest e-cat test:

    http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3303682.ece
    http://ecatnews.com/

    Rossi and his e-cat have a lot of detractors, but he has some pretty significant champions.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8eIhth8Iw8
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Josephson

    Listen to the music! It seems especially appropriate tonight.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?
  • Snip-it

Latest comments

  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Skeptical Science
  • Richard Treadgold on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard Treadgold on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Bob D on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • David on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

October 2011
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox