<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Klein denies deniers&#8217; denials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/klein-denies-deniers-denials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/klein-denies-deniers-denials/</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:22:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Treadgold</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/klein-denies-deniers-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-71395</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 02:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11903#comment-71395</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, Mike. After reading this and looking into it, I had to write another post! Let me know what you think.

Cheers,
Richard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Mike. After reading this and looking into it, I had to write another post! Let me know what you think.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Richard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/klein-denies-deniers-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-71383</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11903#comment-71383</guid>
		<description>Can you say Watermelon?  I bet she doesn&#039;t shave her legs.

However, without researching who in hell she is, I would surmise that she is simply another rat on the sinking HMS Boiling Planet shilling for one last rally against the evils of denialist consumerist corporatist capitalist Heartlanders.  Pay her no mind, for she clearly is without one.

HMS Boiling Planet is indeed taking on water and, as the Chief Engineer of the Titanic said, &quot;She will sink&quot;.  The latest evidence of this flooding of the engine room is the IPCC draft report:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;According to a preliminary report released by the IPCC, there will be no detectable influence of mankind’s influence on the Earth’s weather systems for at least thirty years, and possibly not until the end of this century.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

and 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;“It is likely that the global frequency of tropical cyclones will either decrease or remain essentially unchanged.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/18/the-gwpf-responds-to-new-ipcc-report/

What will remain of the AGW charade?  Already there is a discernible change of emphasis from climate to weather ...
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Our work adds to what we know about climate change in the real world and places the whole problem of climate change in a new light,” he said. “Nobody has looked for these daily changes on a global scale. We usually think of climate change as an increase in mean global temperature and potentially more extreme conditions — there’s practically no discussion of day-to-day variability.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
and this revealing snippet:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;“It’s important to know what the daily extremes might do because we might care about that sooner,”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/15/erractic-extreme-press-release-puts-princeton-climate-science-in-a-new-light/

So, regardless of whether the climate is warming, the new paradigm is that the weather extremes are increasing in frequency, power and duration.  What causes this?  Nobody is saying, but implied is AGW, despite the major indicator of the theory (warming) not happening and predicted by the IPCC (whatever that prediction is worth) to continue not warming for the remainder of this century.  The likes of Klein will continue to spout their vitriolic misinformation and hate speech against Heartlanders and the global power brokers will continue to impose a price on carbon (because they can).

Interesting times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you say Watermelon?  I bet she doesn&#8217;t shave her legs.</p>
<p>However, without researching who in hell she is, I would surmise that she is simply another rat on the sinking HMS Boiling Planet shilling for one last rally against the evils of denialist consumerist corporatist capitalist Heartlanders.  Pay her no mind, for she clearly is without one.</p>
<p>HMS Boiling Planet is indeed taking on water and, as the Chief Engineer of the Titanic said, &#8220;She will sink&#8221;.  The latest evidence of this flooding of the engine room is the IPCC draft report:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>According to a preliminary report released by the IPCC, there will be no detectable influence of mankind’s influence on the Earth’s weather systems for at least thirty years, and possibly not until the end of this century.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>and </p>
<blockquote><p><i>“It is likely that the global frequency of tropical cyclones will either decrease or remain essentially unchanged.”</i></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/18/the-gwpf-responds-to-new-ipcc-report/" rel="nofollow">http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/18/the-gwpf-responds-to-new-ipcc-report/</a></p>
<p>What will remain of the AGW charade?  Already there is a discernible change of emphasis from climate to weather &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><i>“Our work adds to what we know about climate change in the real world and places the whole problem of climate change in a new light,” he said. “Nobody has looked for these daily changes on a global scale. We usually think of climate change as an increase in mean global temperature and potentially more extreme conditions — there’s practically no discussion of day-to-day variability.”</i></p></blockquote>
<p>and this revealing snippet:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>“It’s important to know what the daily extremes might do because we might care about that sooner,”</i></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/15/erractic-extreme-press-release-puts-princeton-climate-science-in-a-new-light/" rel="nofollow">http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/15/erractic-extreme-press-release-puts-princeton-climate-science-in-a-new-light/</a></p>
<p>So, regardless of whether the climate is warming, the new paradigm is that the weather extremes are increasing in frequency, power and duration.  What causes this?  Nobody is saying, but implied is AGW, despite the major indicator of the theory (warming) not happening and predicted by the IPCC (whatever that prediction is worth) to continue not warming for the remainder of this century.  The likes of Klein will continue to spout their vitriolic misinformation and hate speech against Heartlanders and the global power brokers will continue to impose a price on carbon (because they can).</p>
<p>Interesting times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

