Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Global warming spreads by word of morph

Richard Treadgold | December 21, 2011

Here in New Zealand, the NZ Climate Science Coalition has battled for several years to understand the national temperature record and get the data released that lies behind it. Now we battle to correct it.
 
Because NIWA, in “reconstructing” the record, manages miraculously to lower past temperatures and increase recent ones to create a spurious warming that overstates the actual national warming over the last hundred years by 168%!
 
We’ve told NIWA about it and we’ve sent them our report that proves it, but they refuse to acknowledge our finding, much less explain themselves. It is a national disgrace which our newspapers, magazines, radio stations and television channels strangely refuse to investigate.
 
The warming is truly man-made, for it hasn’t happened in the real world, it has been created only by the adjustments.
 
Now, from C3 Headlines, we learn that an even more invidious process has been going on in the United States.
 
Every month, the old temperature record “morphs” into a slightly different shape. Nobody would notice without taking a real close look. Constant adjustments keep the old temperatures going down and recent temperatures going up, increasing the rate of global warming with every move.
 
Naturally, when respected scientists at NOAA say the temperature has been going up, people believe them. But if this story is true, their message of warming is only produced by unscientific methods.
 
Shame on them! I wonder – did New Zealand get it from the USA, or did we infect them? This is a discomfiting analysis, even without accepting the article’s political remarks.

Newspapers

This is an adopted article.

“Science” By Lubchenco’s NOAA: Fake Global Warming By Changing Historical Temperature Data

To promote the global warming scare, Jane Lubchenco’s NOAA continuously changes past temperature records to create fake warming – on a monthly basis

When one starts working with temperature data from various climate research agencies, one begins to notice rather bizarre style of science that would likely qualify as fraud in the mind of a normal person. In the case of NOAA / NCDC, this Obama “science” research group is demonstrably fabricating new “global warming” every single month.

Below is a simple example of the historical temperature record changes being done by Obama’s NOAA on a monthly basis:

As can be seen, literally, Jane Lubchenco and her team are changing historical temperature records each and every month (note how they have “warmed” May 2008 since the NOAA report of December 2008) – even changing the historical record back to the very beginning, the January 1880 temperature record.

We asked a well known climate expert, Dr. Timothy Ball, if what Obama’s NOAA / NCDC climate scientists are doing is common in the general science community: that is, is it common to constantly revise historical empirical evidence? Here is his response:

“Absolutely not. There are adjustments to the raw data done by each nation when it collects the data. For me there are even questions about this, but it means that what goes to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and then to the Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN) and used as “raw data” is already adjusted. Post-collection adjustments are unnecessary and unacceptable.”

With that said, it appears Lubchenco’s NOAA is conducting a corrupt style of science that amounts to an Orwellian revision of history and empirical evidence. Not necessarily a surprise when a left / progressive ‘Big Green’ political hack is put in charge.

So what has been Jane’s impact on temperature history with all these small revisions being done on a monthly basis? Well…one would expect that proponents of global warming alarmism would want to make modern temperatures warmer and earlier temperatures cooler.

Surprise! That exact politically-correct green agenda is robustly being carried out by NOAA’s “scientists” as seen below.

The above record of temperature change over the four months since July 2011, by NOAA & NCDC personnel, is definitely not random. There is a significant man-made pattern to the cooling and warming changes.

Soooo…since Obama’s “science” team has been in place, how much have they changed the historical temperature records?

Examining the historical record changes since 2008, the same pattern emerges with warming changes dominating after 1951 – “Unequivocal” global warming by humans indeed! Those cooling changes dominate the period prior to 1940. Lubchenco even provides “unequivocal” global cooling on demand – what an amazing goddess of left / liberal / progressive science!

Back to the facts. And when comparing the left axis of both charts, it becomes abundantly clear that all those small changes done on a monthly basis by NOAA starts accumulating to become ever larger changes over a few years. Obviously, Obama’s team believes in man-made warming, especially when they simply accomplish it on their PCs.

Most importantly for policymakers and the public, the above data falsification is good reason not to trust anything the green activist Jane Lubchenco says, nor any of her NOAA / NCDC minions carrying out her political agenda.

Previous unequivocal-warming and unprecedented-warming postings. Additional fabricating-fake, modern and historical temperature charts.

Categories
General
Tags
Air temperature, Climate research, Climate science, Data quality, General, Global temperature, NIWAgate, NOAA, NZ temperature records, USA
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Delayers today, deniers tomorrow Cloud watching »

6 Responses to “Global warming spreads by word of morph”

  1. Clarence says:
    December 22, 2011 at 3:40 am

    Unbelievable!

    I could understand a once-and-for all-revision. Perhaps even a second one is some aspect is overlooked. But every month! And always incremental amounts in the same direction!

    Can anybody think of an innocent explanation?

    Reply
    • Richard C (NZ) says:
      December 22, 2011 at 7:55 am

      Yes. Just as CO2 can produce phenomenal warming in the future, it also has amazing retroactive capability to produce warming and cooling in the past that must be constantly accounted for. Otherwise if nothing was done, who would ever know that past temperatures are effected by CO2 in this way?

      English technicians lurking may question my use of “effected”, viz:-

      tr.v. ef·fect·ed,
      1. To bring into existence.
      2. To produce as a result.
      3. To bring about.

      Not being an expert in my first (and only) language, is is possible that I have inadvertently used the wrong word and perhaps “affected” would be more appropriate:-

      adj. af·fect·ed,
      1. Acted upon, influenced, or changed.
      2. Emotionally stirred or moved.
      3. Infected or attacked, as by disease.

      I’m open to correction.

      Reply
      • Richard Treadgold says:
        December 22, 2011 at 8:28 am

        Hi Richard, I can’t resist this!

        On the face of it, CO2 simply “affects” past temperatures. That is, it is one of such influencing factors.
        You could only use “effects” if CO2 was the only, or the vastly predominant, influence, since in this context it means “cause”.
        I hope that’s clear.

        Thanks, now I wander back to work.

        Reply
  2. Richard C (NZ) says:
    December 22, 2011 at 8:34 am

    NOAA data is readily accessible by all comers (not just US citizens0 and being one that does I’m grateful for the free information but I steer well clear of temperatures preferring warts-n-all HadCRUT3 to any US sourced series due to the dodgy adjustments (see below), but these NCDC monthly adjustments are a revelation as to the extent of the manipulation.

    The blogosphere is rife with examples but just a couple that I’m sure most are already aware of:-

    The US series blink comparator:-

    http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/1998changesannotated.gif?w=500&h=355

    NASA GISS – Adjusting the Adjustments

    http://climateaudit.org/2010/12/26/nasa-giss-adjusting-the-adjustments/

    I.e. give GISS a MISS and now NCDC also.

    Reply
    • Richard C (NZ) says:
      December 23, 2011 at 8:42 am

      Jimmy Works His Arctic Magic

      Posted on December 22, 2011 by Steven Goddard

      [See blink comparator] http://www.real-science.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Gidd_12_2011.gif

      Despite having no data north of 80N, Hansen has determined that it was very hot there in November. By fabricating a huge 4-8C anomaly at the North Pole, he is able to keep global temperatures (barely) rising this century, while HadCRUT shows global temperatures falling.

      He also did a bang up job warming Greenland well above measured temperatures. RSS showed almost all of Greenland cold, but Hansen’s magic crayon did an impressive job of heating the place up.

      [See image]

      http://www.real-science.com/jimmy-works-arctic-magic

      Reply
  3. Gary says:
    December 23, 2011 at 8:04 pm

    No doubt about it it is unethical fraud. Out of it if it is accepted, people will be taxed, people will loose jobs, and possibly whole communities destroyed, because of someones political agenda. The greens are such unethical dirtbags.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Relationship between greenhouse gases and global temperature
  • Sun sets on solar subsidies
  • Strike three for TVNZ
  • Climate delegates in dark
  • We won’t be dissuaded from our global goal
  • Measure, for measures are better
  • Warmists finally admit temperature is not warming
  • The best way to post comments
  • Climate doctrine crushed
  • It’s climate denial all right
  • Anthropogenic ocean heating Part 1
  • No evidence no reason for complacency
  • Strike two for TVNZ
  • GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought

Latest comments

  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Richard C (NZ) on Climate Models
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Richard Treadgold on Disproving AGW
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Richard Treadgold on Disproving AGW
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Andy on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Andy on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Andy on UK
  • Mike Jowsey on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Andy on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Richard Treadgold on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Richard Treadgold on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Andy on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Mike Jowsey on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Richard C (NZ) on UK

Chuck a buck

If you like our work, throw us a bone, friend. The smallest amount is huge.
Thank you!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarm Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environment ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change blogroll

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • No Tricks Zone
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

December 2011
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Previous posts

Oil prices

Reality mocks models

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

Hot spot fails reality check

IPCC fingerprint
GHG fingerprint missing

About 2000, climate scientists predicted, and the IPCC agreed, that, if the global temperature was strongly influenced by carbon dioxide (or GHG generally), there'd be a unique "fingerprint" publicising that influence high over the tropics — a tropospheric hot spot. So they started looking for it — and they haven't given up.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox