Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Little authority for dog of a job

Richard Treadgold | June 3, 2012
tyrants

Are you getting used to it?

First, random stopping of any innocent person on the public street, with no cause needing to be shown, to catch the occasional miscreant. You got used to that. Now it’s mere local body bureaucrats breaking into our formerly sacrosanct houses to enforce some obscure little bylaw about keeping pets. Ready to march down the Queen Street, are we? I wish. But by now we’re all too used to it!

Week after week we chase the couldn’t-care-less dog owners to renew their licence. They want the dog — we let them have it. Why can’t they pay up on time? Sure, we put the price up 300%. But we go to a lot of trouble and expense in administration. Like I say, we chase the little buggers all year long, and it’s always the same culprits.

So there I am, I can hear the dog in the house, and the owner’s obviously not home. I want that dog. There’s only one thing the owners understand, and that’s losing their precious bloody pet. I’m going in. I find a window ajar and unlock the front door. Don’t tell me I need a damned search warrant.

The NZ Herald today carries evidence that even Kiwis can turn to the dark side, and all quite justified, apparently. But who understands that this is only the beginning? That without extraordinary effort, things can never return to what they were. The first time a mere dog control officer breaks into a person’s home means that, while human memory lasts, it has happened before. The Herald:

A woman is [sic] says a dog control officer broke into her home to seize her dog because his registration was overdue.

Liesje Bradley alleges the officer broke into her Te Atatu home on Tuesday.

She had forgotten to register Monty, a 10-year-old Jack Russell-fox terrier cross, after her son suffered serious head injuries after a scooter accident.

Under the Dog Control Act 1996, dog control officers can seize an unregistered dog, and may enter a property to do so, but they may not enter the owner’s “dwelling house”.

When contacted yesterday, an Auckland Council spokesman said he would only be able to access information about this case next week.

I’m singularly unimpressed by the bureaucrat who claims to know nothing about the “case”.

Every bullying bureaucrat has a little authority, and everyone with a little authority will at times stretch it as far as it will go. I hope the police see this event for what it is, a bullying petty Hitler with more social agenda on his mind than social equity. Or is it more simply justified by a kind of practical expediency — this was the easiest way of getting the job done?

So are tyrants justified the world over. This one needs a sharp reminder of exactly who employs him. It’s the people whose homes he invades. He needs a pointed reminder of the rights they have in our civilised society.

Monty was home alone on Tuesday and was shut inside the house. A neighbour noticed the officer and four or five others at the house and phoned Bradley straight away.

The officer asked the neighbour whether they were “good people”, and then agreed to leave without Monty.

Bradley left work to come home immediately and found the front door unlocked and the bedroom window ajar. She found a notice on a dresser stating the officer’s name and mobile number.

What an invasion. What an odious betrayal. A private person entering a stranger’s home like that would be arrested. Yet what will happen to this disgraceful council officer?

She said there was no evidence of a search warrant having been issued, nor any complaints against Monty.

In short order, I want to see evidence of an arrest warrant being executed on this abominable little man, or of his police questioning.

What a violation of our public trust. In New Zealand, land of the free Kiwi, home of the brave wave.

Categories
General
Tags
Dog licences, Law, New Zealand
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« BREAKING NEWS: Crude oil is natural Exguesstrapolation »

2 Responses to “Little authority for dog of a job”

  1. Mike Jowsey says:
    June 3, 2012 at 2:08 pm

    I thoroughly agree Richard. If Kiwis knew how their freedoms have been systematically eroded over the last 20 years they would be up in arms on the streets, locking up the ‘lawmakers’ who drove us to a point where we cannot move without surveillance, traffic officers can stop us on lonely rural roads in the middle of the night without any reason, Maoris can block and bully beachgoers, local councils are monopolistic bureaucracies who rort the RMA for all it’s worth, parents can’t control their kids with moderate physical restraint, teachers can’t control their kids at all (often feeling physically threatened in the classroom), and democracy is all but dead – the elected and unelected politicians do what they want to maintain power and control with complete disgregard for the majority view.

    Wow, I said all that in one sentence. Crikey, I better shut up now, before I attract the attention of the SAS. ;)

    Reply
  2. Richard Treadgold says:
    June 3, 2012 at 2:19 pm

    Sure it’s a long sentence, but then, it’s a long list of well-meant mistakes.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?
  • Snip-it
  • Forget prosperity, we need the extra tree

Latest comments

  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • David on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Mike Jowsey on Emotional knowledge
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Mike Jowsey on Emotional knowledge
  • Mike Jowsey on Emotional knowledge
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • Bob D on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard Treadgold on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Bob D on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

June 2012
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox