Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Permission granted to view Court file

Richard Treadgold | August 1, 2012

Here’s some good news: Mr Justice Venning said today that he intends granting my request to view the Court documents.

The other party to gain access is APNZ News Service, through Matthew Theunissen – that’s the Herald’s agency.

Because the file is in his Chambers and is the subject of a reserved decision, we must wait until the decision is delivered before we get access to it. I’m looking forward to studying the transcript because I missed a lot by not attending all the hearing. I’m not sure there’s much of interest in the other exhibits, but of course I haven’t seen them yet!

The Registrar’s office told me none of the material exists in electronic form. So that’s a shame – it means anything I want to post online I’ll have to type or convert with an OCR program. So let’s hope the quality is good.

It sounds as though I’ll get access to the whole suitcase full but I might have to be selective in posting only the juicy pieces online. And I won’t see the file for perhaps two or three months anyway.

Categories
General
Tags
Court action, NIWA, NZ temperature records, NZCSC
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Affidavits are for ever Hear the alarm »

8 Responses to “Permission granted to view Court file”

  1. val majkus says:
    August 1, 2012 at 10:23 pm

    2 or 3 months!!!!
    2 or 3 months?????
    oh – two or three months – sigh

    I wish your High Court put its documents online
    Check ours out http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/current-cases-submissions

    What I’d like to see is the Affidavits and their annexures

    Patience ….. I know

    Reply
  2. val majkus says:
    August 1, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    I note Richard that moves are afoot in New Zealand for electronic filing in your High Court
    We’ve moved on to electronic lodgment which does make for easy access

    So look forward to that happy day -

    Reply
  3. val majkus says:
    August 1, 2012 at 10:51 pm

    BTW for legal enthusiasts check out http://www.climatescience.org.nz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=830&Itemid=47
    This posting contains principal affidavits relating to the appllcation to the High Court of New Zealand by the New Zealand Climate Science Education Trust for a Declaratory Judgement in respect of temperatutre records published by the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), due for consideration by the Court later in 2012.

    Index of Trust’s exhibits is here

    Affidavit of Professor Robert M. Carter is here

    Affidavit of Bob Dedekind is here

    Reply
  4. val majkus says:
    August 1, 2012 at 11:09 pm

    http://www.climatescience.org.nz/images/PDFs/2ndsoc.pdf
    here’s the second amended statement of claim

    Reply
  5. val majkus says:
    August 1, 2012 at 11:10 pm

    I think there’s a relevant audit floating around somewhere but I can’t find it sorry

    Reply
  6. val majkus says:
    August 2, 2012 at 1:31 pm

    here’s the audit http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=769&Itemid=1

    Reply
  7. val majkus says:
    August 5, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    does anyone know if the parties received running transcripts during the hearing
    if so could the transcript be posted?

    Reply
    • Richard Treadgold says:
      August 5, 2012 at 5:28 pm

      Sorry, Val, I’ve been away from the keyboard. No, transcripts are not available yet. I hope they will be in the Court file, which is unavailable until the decision is delivered. If they come to light, I’ll be putting them online.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Relationship between greenhouse gases and global temperature
  • Sun sets on solar subsidies
  • Strike three for TVNZ
  • Climate delegates in dark
  • We won’t be dissuaded from our global goal
  • Measure, for measures are better
  • Warmists finally admit temperature is not warming
  • The best way to post comments
  • Climate doctrine crushed
  • It’s climate denial all right
  • Anthropogenic ocean heating Part 1
  • No evidence no reason for complacency
  • Strike two for TVNZ
  • GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought

Latest comments

  • Richard C (NZ) on Climate Models
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Richard Treadgold on Disproving AGW
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Richard Treadgold on Disproving AGW
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Richard C (NZ) on Disproving AGW
  • Andy on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Andy on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Andy on UK
  • Mike Jowsey on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Andy on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Richard Treadgold on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Richard Treadgold on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Andy on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Mike Jowsey on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Richard C (NZ) on UK
  • Mack on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”
  • Andy on Controversy and scandal
  • Andy on Wild Bill McKibben: “Outlaws of physics”

Chuck a buck

If you like our work, throw us a bone, friend. The smallest amount is huge.
Thank you!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarm Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environment ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change blogroll

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • No Tricks Zone
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

August 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Previous posts

Oil prices

Reality mocks models

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

Hot spot fails reality check

IPCC fingerprint
GHG fingerprint missing

About 2000, climate scientists predicted, and the IPCC agreed, that, if the global temperature was strongly influenced by carbon dioxide (or GHG generally), there'd be a unique "fingerprint" publicising that influence high over the tropics — a tropospheric hot spot. So they started looking for it — and they haven't given up.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox