Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Carbon emissions could slow for decades

Richard Treadgold | December 24, 2012

Only in the USA

Carbon Emissions Projected to Remain Flat for Decades – Forbes.

So the good news is the alarmists might be slightly pleased and quieten down a bit.

The bad news is the price of slowing the pace of the Western industrial miracle that’s been relentlessly pulling the world out of poverty, ignorance, sickness, early death and misery for over two centuries.

Will the alarmists reflect on the poverty, lack of medical care, loss of education and general reduction in levels of happiness this will bring?

Anyway, this slow-down concerns emissions only from the US. Considering they emit less than China does, it can’t make much difference to the global climate.

Categories
General
Tags
China, Global emissions, Global warming, USA
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Tornadoes not part of increase in extreme weather Climate change threatens future of pasta »

7 Responses to “Carbon emissions could slow for decades”

  1. Richard C (NZ) says:
    December 25, 2012 at 8:36 am

    USA’s culpability for which they must pay up retroactively was committed post WWII until they were overtaken by China i.e. they are not absolved by the present situation RT.

    This is common knowledge among those demanding climate change loss and damage reparation; something I’m sure you will catch up with in due course.

    Reply
  2. Clarence says:
    December 28, 2012 at 11:16 am

    The Forbes article deals only with USA emissions. This is no surprise, as they have been declining quite quickly over the past decade – since the advent of shale gas. It is ironic that US emission reduction has handily exceeded that of Europe throughout the entire Kyoto Commitment Period.

    But China will continue to open a new coal-fired power plant each week, and India is ramping up to a similar level. There should be plenty of growth in atmospheric concentrations of CO2 over the next 40 years and that will ensure increases in crop yield to feed the additional 3 billion population.

    Reply
    • Richard Treadgold says:
      December 28, 2012 at 11:35 am

      Thank you, my friend.

      What a devastating riposte to the denunciation of normal human economic activity pouring from the spittle-flecked lips of the would-be saviours of our planet.

      Hmm, that’s purple prose if ever I saw it. Not to mention that little economic activity pours from any lips.

      What a smack to the chops of the ruddy greenies!

      Reply
      • Andy says:
        December 28, 2012 at 12:22 pm

        It’s also worth mentioning that Germany has 24 new coal fired power stations planned for the next few years.

        Reply
        • Richard Treadgold says:
          December 28, 2012 at 12:57 pm

          How many is a few?

          Reply
          • Andy says:
            December 28, 2012 at 1:01 pm

            They are all listed here with dates

            http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Coal_power_plant_proposals_in_Germany

            Reply
        • Richard C (NZ) says:
          December 30, 2012 at 8:29 am

          Poland And Czech Republic Ban Germany’s Green Energy

          Germany’s ‘eco-miracle’ simply used the power grids of neighboring countries not only without asking permission but also without paying for it. Now Poland and the Czech Republic have pulled the plug and are building a huge switch-off at their borders with Germany to block the uninvited import of green energy from Germany which is destabalising their grids and are thus risking blackouts.

          http://www.thegwpf.org/poland-czech-republic-ban-germanys-green-energy/

          Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?
  • Snip-it
  • Forget prosperity, we need the extra tree

Latest comments

  • Mike Jowsey on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Emotional knowledge
  • Alexander K on Emotional knowledge
  • Mike Jowsey on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Global warming less than we thought
  • Mike Jowsey on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Mike Jowsey on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Mike Jowsey on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • David on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Mike Jowsey on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Bob D on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

December 2012
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox