Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Climate change threatens future of pasta

Richard Treadgold | December 24, 2012

This is from Newsweek on 10 December and I know it’s been expertly dealt with elsewhere, but it’s so questionable I can’t ignore it. From notes I made at the time, the links below start to argue with their alarming premise.

Hurricane Sandy’s recent devastation of New York and neighboring states reminded Americans of what Hurricane Katrina demonstrated in 2005: global warming makes weather more extreme, and extreme weather can be extremely dangerous. But flooding coastlines aren’t our only worry. Climate change is also imperiling the very foundation of human existence: our ability to feed ourselves.

Three grains—wheat, corn, and rice—account for most of the food humans consume. All three are already suffering from climate change, but wheat stands to fare the worst in the years ahead, for it is the grain most vulnerable to high temperatures. That spells trouble not only for pasta but also for bread, the most basic food of all. (Pasta is made from the durum variety of wheat, while bread is generally made from more common varieties, such as red spring.)

“Wheat is a cool-season crop. High temperatures are negative for its growth and quality, no doubt about it,” says Frank Manthey, a professor at North Dakota State University who advises the North Dakota Wheat Commission. Already, a mere 1 degree Fahrenheit of global temperature rise over the past 50 years has caused a 5.5 percent decline in wheat production, according to David Lobell, a professor at Stanford University’s Center on Food Security and the Environment.

via Bakken Oil Boom and Climate Change Threaten the Future of Pasta – Newsweek and The Daily Beast.

But here are production figures that contradict that story:

This prediction out to 2026 further contradicts the Newsweek claims.

Global grain harvest sets record despite extreme climatic events

Finally, this new research paper quoting the FAO two months ago blows Newsweek’s inflammatory claims out of the water. Wheat production for 2012 will be a bit reduced, but others are setting records. It explicitly excludes climatic factors from causing reduced harvests now or in the future.

The FAO expects global maize production to increase 4.1 percent from 2011, reaching an estimated 916 million tons in 2012.

Global rice production achieved an all-time high of 480 million tons in 2011, a 2.6 percent increase from 2010.

World wheat production is projected to drop to 675.1 million tons in 2012, down 3.6 percent from 2011, with the largest declines in feed and biofuel utilization.

Since 1961, grain production has increased 269 percent and grain yield has increased 157 percent, while the grain harvest area has increased only 25 percent. This is due largely to the Green Revolution and the introduction of high-yielding grain varieties.

So much for Newsweek!

Categories
General
Tags
Global warming, Grain production, Newsweek, World wheat production
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Carbon emissions could slow for decades Merry Christmas, fresh start, who knows? »

5 Responses to “Climate change threatens future of pasta”

  1. Richard C (NZ) says:
    December 25, 2012 at 8:47 am

    “Wheat is a cool-season crop. High temperatures are negative for its growth and quality, no doubt about it,” says Frank Manthey, a professor at North Dakota State University who advises the North Dakota Wheat Commission

    Huh?

    I search “winter wheat threat from cold” and it turns up ‘Cold Weather Could Threaten Winter Wheat in North Dakota’ from 2007:-

    http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/news/newsreleases/2007/april-12-2007/cold-weather-could-threaten-winter-wheat-in-north-dakota/

    Reply
    • Richard Treadgold says:
      December 26, 2012 at 12:50 pm

      Wheat is a cool-season crop.

      Right. So it grows through the summer when it’s warm and is harvested in the autumn as it cools?

      Reply
      • Richard C (NZ) says:
        December 26, 2012 at 5:48 pm

        Different varieties RT, requiring different climatic conditions and different planting times, winter and spring e.g. Hard Red Winter likes cold and dry, Soft Red Winter likes humid, Hard Red Spring likes hot and dry:-

        Types Of Wheat

        http://www.commodityseasonals.com/types_of_wheat.htm

        The problem with North Dakota winter wheat was prolonged cold because the plant is vulnerable at planting and just after dormancy i.e. on either side of the normal cold period. From the North Dakota article:-

        “Winter wheat is most sensitive to subfreezing temperatures just after planting and in the spring after seedlings break dormancy and start spring growth.”

        And,

        “While a properly acclimatized winter plant might be able to withstand temperatures as low as minus 10 degrees Fahrenheit in January, it probably will only be able to survive temperatures as low as 5 to 10 degrees in early April, and some varieties that are less winter-hardy may succumb at temperatures as high as 24 degrees,”

        And,

        “One advantage we have in North Dakota is that the winter wheat still is very small. Winter wheat in states farther south that is jointing is considerably more sensitive to cold injury than winter wheat in the two- to three-leaf stage that is common for most winter wheat in our state.”

        Reply
  2. John Robertson says:
    December 26, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    Every now and then I wish the promised warming was true, in Canada an area larger than Europe would become warm enough to grow cereal crops and the country would boom.
    From Edmonton to Great slave Lake on the North South axis and the Rocky Mountains to Hudson Bay,east to west, is black spruce and swamp, 2 degrees warming would make all the difference.
    As for wheat being a cold crop, what a maroon.

    Reply
    • Richard Treadgold says:
      December 26, 2012 at 12:51 pm

      Yep, the Team’s full of promises.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?
  • Snip-it
  • Forget prosperity, we need the extra tree
  • Snip-it
  • NZ warming to soar and slump
  • Simple arithmetic
  • Miffed Michele mangles Monckton meeting

Latest comments

  • Mike Jowsey on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • realityrulesok on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Andy on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • realityrulesok on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • realityrulesok on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Andy on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Richard Treadgold on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Andy on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • realityrulesok on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Andy on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • realityrulesok on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • realityrulesok on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • realityrulesok on Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Simon on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Thomas on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Thomas on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Thomas on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

December 2012
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox