Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Temperature records quite old now

Richard Treadgold | December 24, 2012

The global temperature datasets are slow.

We usually have updates within 30 days of the end of a month, but most are about three months behind, with UAH four months slower than normal.

UAH MSU 7-2012
GISTEMP 8-2012
NCDC 8-2012
RSS MSU 8-2012
HadCRUT3 8-2012

Anyone know why?

Categories
General
Tags
Air temperature, Global temperature, Temperature records
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Merry Christmas, fresh start, who knows? I’m a tree — why not feed me? »

8 Responses to “Temperature records quite old now”

  1. Richard C (NZ) says:
    December 25, 2012 at 8:09 am

    Roy Spencer has the UAH November anomaly posted at his website:-

    http://www.drroyspencer.com/2012/12/uah-v5-5-global-temperature-update-for-november-2012-0-28-deg-c/

    Reply
    • Richard Treadgold says:
      December 26, 2012 at 12:45 pm

      Thanks, RC. Not really warming, is It?

      Reply
      • Richard C (NZ) says:
        December 27, 2012 at 9:51 am

        >”Not really warming, is It?”

        Not yet, but apparently 2013 “is likely to be warmer than 2012″ according to the UK Met Office, or ‘A new world record(?)’ as Gareth puts it http://hot-topic.co.nz/a-new-world-record/

        I have no idea what they are basing their forecast on because 2013 ENSO predictions are for neutral conditions, the PDO is in cold mode, the sun’s going into recession etc, etc. I do expect that for the next 1 or 2 years global average temperatures will be elevated because there’s still plenty of residual heat in the ocean to dissipate (mostly in the Nth Atlantic) but it takes a concentrated release by El Niño to boost atm temperatures and it would take a very big one to boost above the 2005 and 2010 levels of the UKMO graph, both were El Niño years.

        What we have to keep in mind is that the UKMO graph is of ANNUAL averages i.e. the graph would be better presented as a bar graph. So their prediction is that the average of the ENTIRE year of 2013 will 0.12 C warmer than the ENTIRE year of 2012 (also an El Niño year) and 0.03 C warmer than the ENTIRE 2005 and 2010 record El Niño years – but how without an El Niño?

        No comments at the HT post; they don’t indulge in this type of analysis there.

        The leading indicator to my mind is SH SST. Except for the 2010 El Niño, that’s been cooling since 2002:-

        http://www.woodfortrees.org/graph/hadsst2sh/from:2000/plot/hadsst2sh/from:2002/trend

        Reply
        • Clarence says:
          January 10, 2013 at 9:57 pm

          I agree that SST trends are probably better indicators of actual global temps than land measures, if only because the latter are so prone to contamination and adjustment.
          Are they measured by satellite or by ships?

          The Hadley graph shows a distinct cooling trend over the past decade. It would be interesting to know whether that visual trend is statistically significant. Does Hadley publish error bars?

          NIWA says that New Zealand temps are largely determined by surrounding SST. If that’s true, we should have seen a cooling in land temps over the past 10 years.

          Richard, why did you confine yourself to the southern hemisphere? It has more acreage than the North but I’d have expected the two to move more or less in tandem.

          Reply
          • Richard C (NZ) says:
            January 11, 2013 at 2:33 am

            Hi Clarence, your questions.

            >”Are they measured by satellite or by ships?”

            21st century HadSST2/3 now from ARGO floats (since 2003/4) and moored buoys. Satellite SST series available too (MODIS Aqua I think). NIWA provides a subscription service of live satellite data for sea surface temperature, chlorophyll analysis and satellite cloud imagery:-

            http://www.niwa.co.nz/our-services/online-services/satellite-data-services

            >”The Hadley graph shows a distinct cooling trend over the past decade. It would be interesting to know whether that visual trend is statistically significant. Does Hadley publish error bars?”

            I don’t know about the significance but the UKMO have given confidence limits on their historical record and 5 year prediction on the HadCRUT graph here Clarence:-

            http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/65157000/jpg/_65157024_65157023.jpg
            http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/08/the-other-big-story-today-bbc-forced-to-admit-global-warming-static/#more-77220

            HadSST is the SST component of HadCRUT, the addition of CRUTEM land tends to dampen the series. I note the lower limit of their prediction is definitely a continuation of cooling if that lower limit eventuates.

            >”NIWA says that New Zealand temps are largely determined by surrounding SST. If that’s true, we should have seen a cooling in land temps over the past 10 years.”

            A polynomial trend of the NZT7 does show cooling over the past 10 years:-

            http://i54.tinypic.com/27xjm0k.png

            >”Richard, why did you confine yourself to the southern hemisphere?”

            For a leading indicator (atmosphere is lagged about a year from ocean), and because there’s more ocean surface in the SH than in the NH, and because the SH metric is more sensitive to ENSO than NH is (see below). In other words, to isolate the predominant indicator.

            >”It has more acreage than the North but I’d have expected the two to move more or less in tandem.”

            Not in tandem at present because the PDO is now in cold mode but the NH AMO is in warm mode (but cooling even so) and will be for some years. When you aggregate NH and SH the difference between the two is lost so it is worth comparing SH, NH and Global side-by-side to see the markedly different SH/NH profiles and absolute levels since 2002 before aggregation and then how they aggregate to the global metric:-

            http://www.woodfortrees.org/graph/hadsst2sh/from:2000/plot/hadsst2sh/from:2002/trend
            http://www.woodfortrees.org/graph/hadsst2nh/from:2000/plot/hadsst2nh/from:2002/trend
            http://www.woodfortrees.org/graph/hadsst2gl/from:2000/plot/hadsst2gl/from:2002/trend

            Over the late 20th century, the PDO was warm, AMO warm, El Nino was dominant, and TSI at grand maximum so we had warming that was erroneously attributed to aGHGs. Now in the 21st we have PDO cold, AMO warm, La Nina dominant (possibly), and TSI down from grand max but still near max levels so there’s not much chance of any more warming from that combination.

            If in a decade or two, it works out to be coinciding cold PDO, cold AMO, La Nina dominant, and TSI at grand minimum there will be radical cold similar to the Maunder Minimum for sure, That’s a speculative scenario of course but certainly a possibility. Scafetta 2009 reckons there’s a 1.5 W.m2 TSI difference between grand max and grand min from what I recall (could be wrong).

            Not forgetting the Indian Ocean has its own oscillations too.

            Reply
  2. John Robertson says:
    December 26, 2012 at 11:57 am

    Numbers will be forthcoming after the proper adjustments are made, standby.
    Sarcastic I know but the meme of 2012 being warm needs all the help the team can give it.

    Reply
    • Richard Treadgold says:
      December 26, 2012 at 12:45 pm

      :-)

      Reply
    • Earthling (Spain) says:
      December 27, 2012 at 6:45 am

      I’m sure they’ll manage it somehow.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Strike two for TVNZ
  • GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?

Latest comments

  • Andy on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard Treadgold on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Mike Jowsey on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Huub Bakker on Strike two for TVNZ
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on USA
  • Richard C (NZ) on USA
  • Richard C (NZ) on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Global warming less than we thought
  • Mike Jowsey on Global warming less than we thought
  • Mike Jowsey on Strike two for TVNZ
  • Richard C (NZ) on Global warming less than we thought
  • Magoo on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • Magoo on Global warming less than we thought
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

December 2012
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox