Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Tornadoes not part of increase in extreme weather

Richard Treadgold | December 24, 2012

Peter Griffin: Tornadoes don’t indicate extreme weather is increasing – NZ Herald.

Old news alert (6 Dec) – I’m catching up.

This is good news. Nobody wants tornadoes to increase. Of course, there are other indications that extreme weather will increase – is perhaps already increasing – so please don’t stop worrying.

But it’s disappointing to see the Herald recycling posts from SciBlogs.

Categories
General
Tags
Extreme weather, NZ Herald, Sciblogs
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Will release of AR5 draft help IPCC make good? Carbon emissions could slow for decades »

5 Responses to “Tornadoes not part of increase in extreme weather”

  1. Andy says:
    December 24, 2012 at 9:05 am

    Interesting reading the first few comments on that article that appear to be from the great brainwashed public who believe the scriptures of Lord Gore rather than the actual scientific evidence. Heck, Peter Griffin isn’t even a sceptic!

    Reply
    • Richard Treadgold says:
      December 24, 2012 at 10:12 am

      Yes, I see what you mean. They mock Griffin on the grounds of his perceived beliefs, though he’s speaking the truth, and his beliefs are in fact aligned with their own! How quick they are to conflate, first, tornadoes with extreme weather (in the face of the science) and then the weather with our wicked society. There are weird results when people go about unthinking.

      Reply
      • Andy says:
        December 24, 2012 at 10:42 am

        Well, as we know, scientists have shown that 50% of the population are of below average intelligence, so what can one expect?

        Reply
        • Richard Treadgold says:
          December 24, 2012 at 10:57 am

          As much as 50%? You must be joking. How can there be that many under-average people walking around? The thought’s incredible. You’re in denial!

          Reply
  2. Earthling (Spain) says:
    December 27, 2012 at 6:58 am

    This is blasphemy, surely everyone knows that tornadoes are part of the increase in extreme weather, don’t they?
    Kerry Blames Tornado Outbreak on Global Warming
    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/07/kerry-blames-tornado-outbreak-on-global-warming/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?
  • Snip-it
  • Forget prosperity, we need the extra tree

Latest comments

  • Barry on Global warming less than we thought
  • Pete Ridley on Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard Treadgold on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Mike Jowsey on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Emotional knowledge
  • Alexander K on Emotional knowledge
  • Mike Jowsey on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Global warming less than we thought
  • Mike Jowsey on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard C (NZ) on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

December 2012
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox