<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Disproving AGW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/category/disproving-agw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mother of a hoax</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mother-of-a-hoax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mother-of-a-hoax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNFCCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A headline caught my eye today. It was a case of over-sensitivity caused by too many hits on the same nerve &#8211; the climate change nerve, but it illustrated the masterful social engineering that went on 20 years ago. The headline was from the Mother Nature Network: Climate change gives gardeners new options Curious, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mother-of-a-hoax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass matters</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mass-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mass-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big things influence little things. Little things hardly at all influence big things. Please bear this in mind when the topic of climate comes up. Let me elaborate. In the fourth form, little boys do not push big fat boys around and taunt them with &#8220;who&#8217;s a mummy&#8217;s boy, then?&#8221; The big fat boys pick [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mass-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public opinion at tipping point</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/public-opinion-at-tipping-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/public-opinion-at-tipping-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following article was just published in none other than the Wall Street Journal, signed by the 16 scientists listed at the end of the article. The mood towards catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) is surely in some upheaval. It&#8217;s wonderful to hear the disgraceful treatment of Chris de Freitas described in sympathetic terms, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/public-opinion-at-tipping-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credible source, credible argument, credible doubt</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/credible-source-credible-argument-credible-doubt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/credible-source-credible-argument-credible-doubt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lord Turnbull, former Cabinet Secretary and head of the Civil Service from 2002 to 2005. From the GWPF come these remarks by Lord Turnbull to the House of Lords on January 12th, two days ago. House of Lords: That this House takes note of the Government’s green agenda: My Lords, in a short debate, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/credible-source-credible-argument-credible-doubt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A case of the blind leading the climatologists</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/a-case-of-the-blind-leading-the-climatologists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/a-case-of-the-blind-leading-the-climatologists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been no significant global surface warming this century, yet experts say that temperatures rose during the first decade, becoming seriously hot. Hotter than ever before, in fact. For example: January 21, 2010: Past Decade Warmest on Record, NASA Data Shows The decade ending in 2009 was the warmest on record, new surface temperature [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/a-case-of-the-blind-leading-the-climatologists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laking recycles dishonesty</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-recycles-dishonesty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-recycles-dishonesty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCG blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Laking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opponents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s one thing to be misunderstood, quite another to be repeatedly misquoted. A misunderstanding can be a mere message muddle &#8211; happens all the time &#8211; and mistakenly misquoting is minor misconduct. But continuing to misquote someone after being told what they actually said is unforgivable. Crafting your assertions to your own ends rather than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-recycles-dishonesty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN desperate, dangerous</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/un-desperate-dangerous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/un-desperate-dangerous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UN &#8220;scientists&#8221; are taking desperate risks with their reputations, attempting to cover up their deceptions about a climatic peril that doesn&#8217;t exist. Some scientists at the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) have become desperate to cover up their hamfisted deceptions aimed at generating support for their hypothesis that mankind is causing the Earth to catastrophically heat [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/un-desperate-dangerous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Klein denies deniers&#8217; denials</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/klein-denies-deniers-denials/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/klein-denies-deniers-denials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joanne Nova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Klein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Naomi Klein uses the word &#8220;denier&#8221; and its derivatives no fewer than 28 times* in a single article, she telegraphs her belief that those so labelled cannot be motivated by facts. Jo Nova, once again prepared to fearlessly battle climate bigotry, confronts Klein&#8217;s vacuous arguments with her usual cutting perspicacity, real science and humorous [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/klein-denies-deniers-denials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Errors remain</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/errors-remain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/errors-remain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 07:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earth&#8217;s temperature has never been taken, actually A story, Analysis confirms global warming data, accounts for urban heat islands, appeared in the Science Media Centre (SMC) on 21 October. I missed it then, but it&#8217;s been brought to my attention in correspondence within the Climate Science Coalition. A member saw the SMC story and commented: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/errors-remain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suppression of sceptical views continues</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/suppression-of-sceptical-views-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/suppression-of-sceptical-views-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John O'Sullivan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate Realists carried a letter from John O&#8217;Sullivan on 2 November, claiming ill treatment at the hands of Suite101.com, in terminating their publishing arrangement with him. I note that two of O&#8217;Sullivan&#8217;s articles are still available at Suite101 but this is his letter: Friends, I write to announce my employment with my publishers, Suite101 was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/suppression-of-sceptical-views-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

