<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Global warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/category/global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NZ temperature record &#8212; it&#8217;s worse than we thought</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/02/nz-temperature-record-its-worse-than-we-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/02/nz-temperature-record-its-worse-than-we-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to those who advised me of this amazing email from the Climategate 2 collection, either through comments here or private email. It concerns the pre-1930 cooling of the New Zealand temperature record, and makes food for thought, especially for those supporting NIWA, Salinger and the increasingly shaky AGW story. Although it&#8217;s more of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/02/nz-temperature-record-its-worse-than-we-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fallacy is strong in that one</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/the-fallacy-is-strong-in-that-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/the-fallacy-is-strong-in-that-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gore: Global warming skeptics are this generation’s racists One day climate change skeptics will be seen in the same negative light as racists, or so says former Vice President Al Gore. “My generation asked old people, ‘Explain to me again why it is okay to discriminate against people because their skin color is different?’ And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/the-fallacy-is-strong-in-that-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More about the NZ temperature record</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started preparing this last August, when the NZ Climate Science Coalition published its audit of NIWA&#8217;s review of the official NZ temperature record. The topic is important to me, so now, embarrassed, I tidy it up because it&#8217;ll do more good being posted in the wild than sitting on my hard drive. &#8211; Richard [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sceptics query our truth &#8211; we shall besmirch and slander them</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/sceptics-query-our-truth-we-shall-besmirch-and-slander-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/sceptics-query-our-truth-we-shall-besmirch-and-slander-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Leyland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Denier, denier, pants on fire Deniers claim debate is &#8216;over&#8217; because they can&#8217;t win it Constant practise of scepticism is the root of good science Hot Topic have been reviling our good friend and climate warrior Bryan Leyland for his opinion piece published recently. Not to mention several other sceptical climate articles by other people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/sceptics-query-our-truth-we-shall-besmirch-and-slander-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mother of a hoax</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mother-of-a-hoax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mother-of-a-hoax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNFCCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A headline caught my eye today. It was a case of over-sensitivity caused by too many hits on the same nerve &#8211; the climate change nerve, but it illustrated the masterful social engineering that went on 20 years ago. The headline was from the Mother Nature Network: Climate change gives gardeners new options Curious, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mother-of-a-hoax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass matters</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mass-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mass-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big things influence little things. Little things hardly at all influence big things. Please bear this in mind when the topic of climate comes up. Let me elaborate. In the fourth form, little boys do not push big fat boys around and taunt them with &#8220;who&#8217;s a mummy&#8217;s boy, then?&#8221; The big fat boys pick [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/mass-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public opinion at tipping point</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/public-opinion-at-tipping-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/public-opinion-at-tipping-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following article was just published in none other than the Wall Street Journal, signed by the 16 scientists listed at the end of the article. The mood towards catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) is surely in some upheaval. It&#8217;s wonderful to hear the disgraceful treatment of Chris de Freitas described in sympathetic terms, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/public-opinion-at-tipping-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insensitive climate</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/insensitive-climate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/insensitive-climate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate sensitivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barry Brill points out the warmists don&#8217;t seem pleased at the recent good news about climate sensitivity (a new paper says it&#8217;s not going to warm catastrophically). Could it be because the warmists cry only crocodile tears about the forecast disaster and they&#8217;re actually looking forward to it? (It lets them control us.) – Richard [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/insensitive-climate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the beginning was the Warming</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/in-the-beginning-was-the-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/in-the-beginning-was-the-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No investigation was ordered, no scientific survey was done, no public debate was held, there was no waiting around for the results of a Royal Commission of Inquiry and there were certainly no tiresome disputes over the interpretations of any actual experiments. The Framework Convention on Climate Change written by these geniuses bypassed all that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/in-the-beginning-was-the-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No global warming in New Zealand</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/no-global-warming-in-new-zealand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/no-global-warming-in-new-zealand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In July last year the NZ Climate Science Coalition published an independent analysis of NIWA&#8217;s reconstruction of our national temperature record (NZTR) entitled New Zealand – Unaffected by Global Warming. It&#8217;s the only independent analysis carried out on the reconstruction (nobody else has bothered). As far as I know, nobody much has even read the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/no-global-warming-in-new-zealand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

