<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Michael Mann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/category/michael-mann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Climategate Part 2 — 2,000-page epic of science and scepticism</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-2-%e2%80%94-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-2-%e2%80%94-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRU leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Mann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Briffa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=2318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First published at the National Post: December 21, 2009, 2:33 pm There&#8217;s trouble over tree rings as the Climategate emails reveal a rift between scientists. For Part 1, go here. By Terence Corcoran In the thousands of emails released last month in what is now known as Climategate, the greatest battles took place over scientists’ [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-2-%e2%80%94-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climategate Part 1 &#8211; 2,000-page epic of science and scepticism</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-1-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-1-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRU leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Mann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Briffa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=2285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This summary from the National Post of the Climategate emails and what has been discovered in them is the best I have seen. It is especially pleasing to hear Terence Corcoran&#8217;s moderate tone. The contents of the released emails and computer code throw strong doubt on the conclusions of the science of global warming. Everything [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-1-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

