<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; NIWA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/category/niwa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NZ temperature record &#8212; it&#8217;s worse than we thought</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/02/nz-temperature-record-its-worse-than-we-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/02/nz-temperature-record-its-worse-than-we-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to those who advised me of this amazing email from the Climategate 2 collection, either through comments here or private email. It concerns the pre-1930 cooling of the New Zealand temperature record, and makes food for thought, especially for those supporting NIWA, Salinger and the increasingly shaky AGW story. Although it&#8217;s more of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/02/nz-temperature-record-its-worse-than-we-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More about the NZ temperature record</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started preparing this last August, when the NZ Climate Science Coalition published its audit of NIWA&#8217;s review of the official NZ temperature record. The topic is important to me, so now, embarrassed, I tidy it up because it&#8217;ll do more good being posted in the wild than sitting on my hard drive. &#8211; Richard [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No global warming in New Zealand</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/no-global-warming-in-new-zealand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/no-global-warming-in-new-zealand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In July last year the NZ Climate Science Coalition published an independent analysis of NIWA&#8217;s reconstruction of our national temperature record (NZTR) entitled New Zealand – Unaffected by Global Warming. It&#8217;s the only independent analysis carried out on the reconstruction (nobody else has bothered). As far as I know, nobody much has even read the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/no-global-warming-in-new-zealand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One man&#8217;s mission</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/one-mans-mission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/one-mans-mission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Salinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will NIWA ever be free of Jim Salinger? What will it take to rid the organisation of his pervasive influence? He was fired long ago for his maverick media mouth, but his spirit never leaves, and the bright ideas of his younger self, not good enough to attract other scientists, still torment NIWA&#8217;s management as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/one-mans-mission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIWA&#8217;s web site a revelation</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/niwas-web-site-a-revelation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/niwas-web-site-a-revelation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 02:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; NIWA has an interesting web site which they change frequently. One must visit often to keep up with the changes, because NIWA never sends one a memo. There&#8217;s a section under Climate called &#8220;NZ temperature record&#8221; where you can see the latest version of the seven-station temperature series. I think the judge supervising our [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/niwas-web-site-a-revelation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courting NIWA</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/courting-niwa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/courting-niwa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NIWA is creeping closer to court to answer our allegations. It can&#8217;t fudge the facts in there. Where the fudges have judges UPDATE 1, 16 Sep 9:30 &#8211; If anyone harbours lingering doubts that NIWA claim to have used a particular method in calculating the adjustments in their &#8220;Review report&#8221; published last December, let them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/courting-niwa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIWA&#8217;s sham: but wait — there&#8217;s more</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/niwas-sham-but-wait-%e2%80%94-theres-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/niwas-sham-but-wait-%e2%80%94-theres-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Holy Grail Independently peer-reviewed scientific papers published in learned journals are the Holy Grail of climate science alarmists, and the IPCC in particular. So they want to get friendly papers in and keep contrary papers out. The Climategate emails show continuous collusion between members of the “Hockey Team” to prevent journal publication of any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/niwas-sham-but-wait-%e2%80%94-theres-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incredible sham from NIWA</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/fraud-or-fumble-from-niwa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/fraud-or-fumble-from-niwa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NIWA shows 168% more warming than Rhoades &#038; Salinger &#8211; the method NIWA betrayed. The blue dashed line shows the warming trend when the method is used correctly. The red line reveals NIWA&#8217;s outrageous fraud &#8211; it&#8217;s much stronger warming, but it&#8217;s empty of truth. NIWA didn&#8217;t use Rhoades &#038; Salinger. We can prove it. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/fraud-or-fumble-from-niwa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What warming?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/what-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/what-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 06:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NIWA&#8217;s paper finds strong warming. But when their temperature data are processed according to the proper methodology, there&#8217;s no unusual warming. Throughout their paper, NIWA cite the proper method, but they never use it. Why not? NIWA&#8217;s data confirms: little warming When it&#8217;s calculated correctly Why did they lie to us? In December last year, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/what-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming not for Kiwis</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/global-warming-not-for-kiwis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/global-warming-not-for-kiwis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The countless thermal pools must have kept global warming away from New Zealand,because there hasn&#8217;t been any. Perhaps we&#8217;re hot enough &#8212; heh, heh. Countless people told us we&#8217;ve been warming warmed up to the warming watch the warming guard against the warming But… But there&#8217;s been no warming &#8212; and NIWA&#8217;s graphs prove it. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/global-warming-not-for-kiwis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

