<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; NZ Herald</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/category/nz-herald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Laking recycles dishonesty</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-recycles-dishonesty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-recycles-dishonesty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCG blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Laking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opponents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s one thing to be misunderstood, quite another to be repeatedly misquoted. A misunderstanding can be a mere message muddle &#8211; happens all the time &#8211; and mistakenly misquoting is minor misconduct. But continuing to misquote someone after being told what they actually said is unforgivable. Crafting your assertions to your own ends rather than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-recycles-dishonesty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laking, liking words, lacking in science</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-liking-words-lacks-in-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-liking-words-lacks-in-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCG blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Laking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opponents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not possible even to keep track of the alarmist stories about climate, far less to refute them all. But when one is personally cited close to home and statements are wrongfully attributed to one, one ought to address them. This Laking/Herald howler is a case in point. Laking has taken his information from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-liking-words-lacks-in-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>de Freitas on solid ground</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/de-freitas-on-solid-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/de-freitas-on-solid-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris de Freitas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is weather? (h/t Bob D for most of the references) Journalist Chris Barton has a story in yesterday&#8217;s Herald titled The climate dissenter holds his ground. After looking at Barton&#8217;s alarmist arguments I&#8217;ll stand with Chris de Freitas on the solid ground. The story begins with the implication (not that the journalist says it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/de-freitas-on-solid-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open question for the NZ Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/open-question-for-the-nz-herald/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/open-question-for-the-nz-herald/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editorial writers &#8211; please glance over here I have a question.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/open-question-for-the-nz-herald/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Herald&#8217;s editor ducks the issue</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/heralds-editor-ducks-the-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/heralds-editor-ducks-the-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Murphy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A duck assassination. Sad, but assassinating the duck illustrates an ad hominem attack. There&#8217;s a head in the sights, but no insights ahead. You might kill the duck, but you&#8217;re out for a duck if you duck the issue. There&#8217;s no argument in this tepid denial of reactor safety, and without a challenge, the point [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/heralds-editor-ducks-the-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading on our emotions</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/trading-on-our-emotions-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/trading-on-our-emotions-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Natural wisps of cloud in the thin Auckland air on 4 January. It is into such thin air as this that all our atmospheric emissions disappear. I said &#8216;disappear&#8217; and I meant it, because our emissions of &#8216;greenhouse&#8217; gases are literally invisible. In addition, nearly half of them get absorbed into the land and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/trading-on-our-emotions-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer model is not evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/computer-model-is-not-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/computer-model-is-not-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris de Freitas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Campbell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Letter sent to the Herald on 7 Jan, 2011 Dear Sir, It has come to my attention that you published a (further) letter from a Dr Doug Campbell, again challenging Professor Chris de Freitas&#8217; recent article about the science of global warming. Dr Campbell said: &#8220;The facts support anthropogenic global warming with a doubling of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/computer-model-is-not-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting climate change public insanity</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/11/fighting-climate-change-public-insanity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/11/fighting-climate-change-public-insanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right setting for tough international negotiations; it would keep everyone cool. In the NZ Herald last Wednesday, David Venables, executive-director of the Greenhouse Policy Coalition, talked about world leaders at Cancun soon putting &#8220;the finishing touches to a global agreement on climate change.&#8221; Why do we want such an agreement? Though Mr Venables, oddly, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/11/fighting-climate-change-public-insanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot Topic semi-science now in the Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/hot-topic-semi-science-now-in-the-herald/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/hot-topic-semi-science-now-in-the-herald/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 01:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Herald has thrown in the towel on climate change objectivity by deciding to use highly prejudiced, alarmist posts from Hot Topic. Perhaps they still are reliably impartial on some topics, but they are not impartial on global warming. Now we have the NZ Herald echoing Hot Topic&#8217;s posts from Sciblogs. Man, the Herald have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/hot-topic-semi-science-now-in-the-herald/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudman offensive but NZ temp record dubious</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/rudman-offensive-but-nz-temp-record-dubious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/rudman-offensive-but-nz-temp-record-dubious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A letter sent to the NZ Herald on 25 August that remains unpublished. Sir, In &#8220;Exercise degrees of common sense&#8220;, on Wednesday August 18, Brian Rudman loses his journalistic poise and jeers gracelessly at the &#8220;flat-earth&#8221; members of the NZ Climate Science Coalition. When he asserts that they deny &#8220;man-made global warming&#8221; he is dead [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/rudman-offensive-but-nz-temp-record-dubious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

