<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; What is the evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/category/what-is-the-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sceptics query our truth &#8211; we shall besmirch and slander them</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/sceptics-query-our-truth-we-shall-besmirch-and-slander-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/sceptics-query-our-truth-we-shall-besmirch-and-slander-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Leyland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Denier, denier, pants on fire Deniers claim debate is &#8216;over&#8217; because they can&#8217;t win it Constant practise of scepticism is the root of good science Hot Topic have been reviling our good friend and climate warrior Bryan Leyland for his opinion piece published recently. Not to mention several other sceptical climate articles by other people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/sceptics-query-our-truth-we-shall-besmirch-and-slander-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the beginning was the Warming</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/in-the-beginning-was-the-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/in-the-beginning-was-the-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No investigation was ordered, no scientific survey was done, no public debate was held, there was no waiting around for the results of a Royal Commission of Inquiry and there were certainly no tiresome disputes over the interpretations of any actual experiments. The Framework Convention on Climate Change written by these geniuses bypassed all that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/in-the-beginning-was-the-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credible source, credible argument, credible doubt</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/credible-source-credible-argument-credible-doubt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/credible-source-credible-argument-credible-doubt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lord Turnbull, former Cabinet Secretary and head of the Civil Service from 2002 to 2005. From the GWPF come these remarks by Lord Turnbull to the House of Lords on January 12th, two days ago. House of Lords: That this House takes note of the Government’s green agenda: My Lords, in a short debate, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/credible-source-credible-argument-credible-doubt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A letter to Gavin Schmidt goes unanswered</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/a-letter-to-gavin-schmidt-goes-unanswered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/a-letter-to-gavin-schmidt-goes-unanswered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gavin Schmidt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has taken me a while to follow up on this letter I sent to Gavin Schmidt on 5 March, 2010. It will come as no surprise to anyone that he hasn&#8217;t deigned to answer my email. However, as it expresses succinctly some of the main defences against the &#8220;denier&#8221; appellation I&#8217;ll put it up [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/a-letter-to-gavin-schmidt-goes-unanswered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Booker: Global warming greatest delusion in history?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/booker-global-warming-greatest-delusion-in-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/booker-global-warming-greatest-delusion-in-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 06:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This damning article from Christopher Booker is best appreciated in the whole &#8212; I redact none of it. May our leaders notice it. Now, to be sure, there&#8217;s no sign here of the extreme obsession with global warming that marks the UK government. Thus, there is no local concern with the excesses the UK displays [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/booker-global-warming-greatest-delusion-in-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just one fact</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/just-one-fact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/just-one-fact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 02:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sceptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Albert Einstein. To defeat relativity one did not need the word of 100 scientists, just one fact. &#8211; Albert Einstein. This statement is not true because Einstein made it &#8212; it&#8217;s true because it accords with reason. Theory must always bow to observation. … or just one paper Unfortunately, in CAGW (catastrophic anthropogenic global warming) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/just-one-fact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>de Freitas on solid ground</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/de-freitas-on-solid-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/de-freitas-on-solid-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris de Freitas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is weather? (h/t Bob D for most of the references) Journalist Chris Barton has a story in yesterday&#8217;s Herald titled The climate dissenter holds his ground. After looking at Barton&#8217;s alarmist arguments I&#8217;ll stand with Chris de Freitas on the solid ground. The story begins with the implication (not that the journalist says it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/de-freitas-on-solid-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Clueless&#8217; cries the credulous truffle grubber</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/clueless-cries-the-credulous-truffle-grubber/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/clueless-cries-the-credulous-truffle-grubber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Brash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr Don Brash, leader of the ACT Party. More sense in his little fingerthan some climate deniers have in their whole body. But Brash simply reflects reality A post today at Hot Topic gets really stuck in to Don Brash. Don gave a speech today to the Federated Farmers annual conference. He mentioned the ETS, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/clueless-cries-the-credulous-truffle-grubber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rachel recycles climate con</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/rachel-recycles-climate-con/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/rachel-recycles-climate-con/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Taranaki Daily News two days ago published a polemic notable more for its rancour than its precision regarding climatic facts. It&#8217;s a good example of one-eyed thinking, skewed views and perfectly furious ad hominem attacks &#8212; all teeth and talons and only the hissing missing. Lost her cuddly toy? Written by the doubtless-locally-renowned scribe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/rachel-recycles-climate-con/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter to Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/letter-to-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/letter-to-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 05:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proof please, not propaganda To the Editor Climate Conversation 9th May 2011 We need proof that carbon dioxide is a pollutant in the atmosphere. There is none – only political propaganda. We need proof that global temperatures are controlled by man-made carbon dioxide. There is none – only computer models which are fiddled to fit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/letter-to-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

