Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Papers

This thread is for discussion and listing of climate science papers.

Tags
General
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

4 Responses to “Papers”

  1. Bob D says:
    October 27, 2010 at 5:56 pm

    On the performance of models:

    G. G. Anagnostopoulos et al. (2010) “A comparison of local and aggregated climate model outputs with observed data”

    http://pdfserve.informaworld.com/943561__928051726.pdf

    Abstract:
    We compare the output of various climate models to temperature and precipitation observations at 55 points around the globe.We also spatially aggregate model output and observations over the contiguous USA using data from 70 stations, and we perform comparison at several temporal scales, including a climatic (30-year) scale.
    Besides confirming the findings of a previous assessment study that model projections at point scale are poor, results show that the spatially integrated projections are also poor.

    Reply
  2. Andy says:
    September 20, 2011 at 10:34 am

    Bishop Hill reports that the Salzer et al.paper will play a prominent role in AR5, apparently suggesting that Bristlecone Pines are a reliable temperature proxy.

    http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2011/9/19/yup.html

    The subject of the Bristlecone Pines is discussed at length in BH’s book The Hockey Stick Illusion.

    Reply
  3. Mike Jowsey says:
    January 28, 2013 at 2:13 pm

    New paper:

    Five climate-forcing mechanisms govern 20,000 years of climate change
    By Joachim Seifert and Frank Lemke
    Published on: October 8, 2012 (18 pages)

    Summary available here: http://www.knowledgeminer.eu/pdf/eoo_paper_summary.pdf

    Details!of!demonstrated!astro3climatic!relations!are!as!of!today,!2012,!new!and!origi3
    nal!climate!change!knowledge.!The!IPCC!has!not!been!able!to!provide!supplementary!
    data! on! cycle!mechanics.! The! identification! of! 5! macro3climatic! drivers,!missing! in!
    current!GCMs,!unmistakably!proves!that!climate!science!is!not!settled!yet.!One!miss3
    ing!driver!may!be!excused,!but!not!five.!The!notion!of!”The!Science!is!Settled”,!upheld!
    since!the!days!of!Galileo,!is!a!spiritual!relict!of!the!past.

    Sorry about the formatting of the above excerpt. Copy & paste from pdf glitch.

    Reply
  4. Andy says:
    April 17, 2013 at 3:00 am

    Another paper finds that climate sensitivity is low

    Nic Lewis has had a paper published in Journal of Climate. It’s a reworking of the Forest et al 2006 paper on climate sensitivity, but removing the warm bias of Forest’s uniform prior, as well as dealing with some data issues.

    http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2013/4/16/another-paper-finds-that-climate-sensitivity-is-low.html

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?
  • Snip-it
  • Forget prosperity, we need the extra tree

Latest comments

  • Richard C (NZ) on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Skeptical Science
  • Richard Treadgold on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard Treadgold on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Andy on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Bob D on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • David on Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • D Cotton on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Richard Treadgold on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Bob D on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Australis on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • Alexander K on Emotional knowledge
  • Andy on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Barry on Global warming less than we thought
  • Pete Ridley on Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Thomas on Painting wanting rebuttal

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox