Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • News releases
    • February 8, 2010
    • December 20, 2010
  • Climate Realists
    • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
    • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
    • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
    • Newsletter #4 2011
  • Files
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

NIPCC

This thread is for discussion of the sceptical report entitled “Not the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change” published by a group of scientists.

Tags
Global warming
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

3 Responses to “NIPCC”

  1. THREAD says:
    October 17, 2010 at 4:17 am

    The 2009 report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC)

    Climate Change Reconsidered, was released on Tuesday, June 2, 2009, at a press conference at the Washington Court Hotel in Washington, DC, in conjunction with the Third International Conference on Climate Change. Heartland President Joseph Bast, editor of Climate Change Reconsidered, and authors Craig D. Idso Ph.D. and S. Fred Singer Ph.D.

    http://www.nipccreport.org/reports/2009/2009report.html

    Reply
  2. Richard C (NZ) says:
    December 17, 2010 at 9:02 pm

    Paper: Climate models lack fundamentals to determine global warming

    Saturday, December 11, 2010

    As noted on the NIPCC website this week, a peer-reviewed paper published in Geophysical Research Letters concludes that climate models “lack — or incorrectly parameterize — fundamental processes by which surface temperatures respond to radiative forcings.” In other words, climate computer models used by the IPCC are fundamentally incorrect on predictions of global warming due to greenhouse gas concentrations ["radiative forcings"].

    “To distinguish between simultaneous natural and anthropogenic impacts on surface temperature, regionally as well as globally,” authors Lean and Rind performed “a robust multivariate analysis using the best available estimates of each together with the observed surface temperature record from 1889 to 2006.”

    Lean and Rind report that “contrary to recent assessments based on theoretical models (IPCC, 2007) the anthropogenic warming estimated directly from the historical observations is more pronounced between 45°S and 50°N than at higher latitudes,” which finding, in their words, “is the approximate inverse of the model-simulated anthropogenic plus natural temperature trends … which have minimum values in the tropics and increase steadily from 30 to 70°N.” Furthermore, as they continue, “the empirically-derived zonal mean anthropogenic changes have approximate hemispheric symmetry whereas the mid-to-high latitude modeled changes are larger in the Northern hemisphere.”

    Because of what their analysis revealed, the two researchers concluded that “climate models may therefore lack — or incorrectly parameterize — fundamental processes by which surface temperatures respond to radiative forcings.”

    Reference
    Lean, J.L. and Rind, D.H, 2008. How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006. Geophysical Research Letters 35: 10.1029/2008GL034864.

    Reply
  3. Richard C (NZ) says:
    September 1, 2011 at 10:19 am

    New Report on Global Warming Contradicts U.N.’s IPCC

    According to the new report, “natural causes are very likely to be [the] dominant” cause of climate change that took place in the twentieth and at the start of the twenty-first centuries.

    The 430-page report was coauthored and edited by three climate science researchers: Craig D. Idso, Ph.D., editor of the online magazine CO2 Science and author of several books and scholarly articles on the effects of carbon dioxide on plant and animal life; Robert M. Carter, Ph.D., a marine geologist and research professor at James Cook University in Queensland, Australia; and S. Fred Singer, Ph.D., a distinguished atmospheric physicist and first director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service. Seven additional scientists and one policy expert on sustainable growth made contributions to the volume.

    The book is titled Climate Change Reconsidered: 2011 Interim Report because it precedes a comprehensive volume that is expected to be released in 2013. It focuses on scientific research released since publication of Climate Change Reconsidered: The 2009 Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC).

    Key findings, as outlined in the interim report’s executive summary, include:

    * “We find evidence that the models over-estimate the amount of warming that occurred during the twentieth century and fail to incorporate chemical and biological processes that may be as important as the physical processes employed in the models.”

    * “More CO2 promotes more plant growth both on land and throughout the surface waters of the world’s oceans, and this vast assemblage of plant life has the ability to affect Earth’s climate in several ways, almost all of them tending to counteract the heating effects of CO2’s thermal radiative forcing.”

    * “The latest research on paleoclimatology and recent temperatures [finds] new evidence that the Medieval Warm Period of approximately 1,000 years ago, when there was about 28 percent less CO2 in the atmosphere than there is currently, was both global and warmer than today’s world.”

    * “New research finds less melting of ice in the Arctic, Antarctic, and on mountaintops than previously feared, no sign of acceleration of sea-level rise in recent decades, no trend over the past 50 years in changes to the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (MOC), and no changes in precipitation patterns or river flows that could be attributed to rising CO2 levels.”

    * “Amphibians, birds, butterflies, other insects, lizards, mammals, and even worms benefit from global warming and its myriad ecological effects.”

    * “Rising temperatures and atmospheric CO2 concentrations, by increasing crop yields, will play a major role in averting hunger and ecological destruction in the future.”

    * “The latest research suggests corals and other forms of aquatic life have effective adaptive responses to climate change enabling them to flourish despite or even because of climate change.”

    * “Global warming is more likely to improve rather than harm human health because rising temperatures lead to a greater reduction in winter deaths than the increase they cause in summer deaths.”

    * “Even in worst-case scenarios, mankind will be much better off in the year 2100 than it is today, and therefore able to adapt to whatever challenges climate change presents.”

    http://heartland.org/press-releases/2011/08/29/new-report-global-warming-contradicts-uns-ipcc

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Thanks to WordShine for hosting our site:
   WordShine for polished writing
   WordShine to say what you mean
   Do you need FastProof?

Hot off the press

  • Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Oil prices are still down
  • No treaty, no ETS
  • Retirement of Huntly power generator
  • Oil prices down as Europe staggers
  • … is sauce for the gander
  • The end of scepticism
  • State of the science
  • Reflections on a changing climate
  • The real climate deniers
  • Let us destroy those myths
  • Our world-leading ETS actually hikes hydro
  • Levitus rewarmed
  • NIWA’s data proves NZ warming halt
  • Well, where’s your evidence, Renowden?
  • Deadly effective manipulation
  • Even an oik has freedoms
  • Climate Conversation v. Hot Topic et al.
  • It’s not so easy to ignore your friends
  • Yet again: climate scepticism is founded on facts, not faith

Latest comments

  • Alexander K on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Richard Treadgold on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Andy on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Richard Treadgold on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Ron on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Richard Treadgold on Oil prices are still down
  • Andy on Oil prices are still down
  • Andy on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Richard Treadgold on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Richard Treadgold on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Andy on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • PeterM on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Andy on Cabinet ETS paper makes my toes curl
  • Alexander K on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Andy on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Marian on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS
  • Richard Treadgold on No treaty, no ETS

PayPal Tip Jar
To support what we do here,
please drop us a tiny tip. Thank you!

Thank you


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General links Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels UK United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence World government

Admin

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Previous posts

Oil prices

StatCounter

 
StatCounter
hits
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox