Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • News releases
    • February 8, 2010
    • December 20, 2010
  • Climate Realists
    • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
    • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
    • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
    • Newsletter #4 2011
  • Files
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Opinion polls

Opinion poll graph

There are many things we’d like to know your thinking on, and they are all here at our Online Poll Centre. Some of the questions might cause you to go away and research them; this is excellent. We hope our questions are thought-provoking, so that whatever “side” of the climate “debate” you think you’re on, you get provoked into thinking about the question and not just reacting from habit. If you decide to do further research, that is no bad thing, for it will make you better informed.

It may have been Socrates who said: “I would rather be corrected, than continue in my ignorance.”

In many ways, the main climate-change question is: is it our fault? That’s because we’re being expected to “fix” it. We ask your opinion of that in the “sckscksck” poll, which is our riposte to the “tcktcktck” campaign from the ecomentalists, the one that got us riled up but that failed in Copenhagen.

We call Greenpeace and others the ecomentalists to distinguish them from the proper and benign environmentalists, who are genuinely intelligent and practical about looking after the world around us. Ecomentalists are extremists who want to destroy the modern human way of life, or send it so far back into the past it might as well be destroyed, so that “nature” can carry on happily without us, as it should — as is only natural.

Ecomentalists happily promote a natural way of life for everybody, and especially for third-world people, those still in mud huts and burning dung for cooking, who desperately want access to the same levels of electricity and running water that we enjoy. Ecomentalists promote the old way of life so steadfastly that they refuse to allow native people access to “high-carbon” fuels in any serious quantities.

We’ll add new questions as they occur to us. They’ll probably be related to climate in some way, but we won’t guarantee it, since we like to have fun, too.

So choose a question from the list below and let us know what your opinion is. By all means write your comments on the polls too, and tell us you disagree with them or they’re too hard, they’re stupid, old hat, obscure, etc. You can address your comments to the Climate Conversation Group, me personally, the government, a favourite band, the UN or life itself.

Feel free to express yourself thoroughly (although any badness will be removed). Of course, check back here for new polls.

Online polls

sckscksck – Is the earth warming dangerously from human activities?

Your view of CO2 – Does CO2 dominate the climate?

Collective noun for icebergs – What’s the best collective noun for icebergs?

– Richard Treadgold

Ostrich

Sorry, comments are closed.

Thanks to WordShine for hosting our site:
   WordShine for polished writing
   WordShine for academic editing
   WordShine to say what you mean

Hot off the press

  • NZ temperature record — it’s worse than we thought
  • The fallacy is strong in that one
  • More about the NZ temperature record
  • Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Mother of a hoax
  • Mass matters
  • Public opinion at tipping point
  • Insensitive climate
  • In the beginning was the Warming
  • No global warming in New Zealand
  • My precious
  • Credible source, credible argument, credible doubt
  • NOAA conducts Orwellian revision of empirical evidence
  • More mindless moping on the Maldives
  • Climate lies in high places
  • A case of the blind leading the climatologists
  • A letter to Gavin Schmidt goes unanswered
  • Real Climate smashes methane disaster theory
  • Recruiting AR5 reviewers on ‘spoofed’ IPCC website
  • Letter to the editor

Latest comments

  • Nick on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Richard C (NZ) on Climate science
  • Richard C (NZ) on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Richard C (NZ) on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Richard C (NZ) on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Nick on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Richard C (NZ) on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Richard C (NZ) on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Richard C (NZ) on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Nick on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Richard C (NZ) on UK
  • Richard C (NZ) on Africa
  • Richard C (NZ) on The fallacy is strong in that one
  • Richard C (NZ) on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Nick on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Richard C (NZ) on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them
  • Tom Moriarty on Sea levels
  • Richard C (NZ) on Solar
  • Richard C (NZ) on NZ temperature record — it’s worse than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on Sceptics query our truth – we shall besmirch and slander them

PayPal Tip Jar
To support what we do here,
please drop us a tiny tip. Thank you!

Thank you
To those who've been so generous,
I'm humbled. Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

ACT Activists AGW Air temperature Australia Barry Brill BOM Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Chris de Freitas Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate profiteering Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Energy supply ETS Glaciers Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Joanne Nova New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Peter Gluckman Rajendra Pachauri Royal Society Roy Spencer Sceptics Science bias Sea ice Sea levels UK United Nations Watts Up With That Wind turbines

Categories

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Previous posts

Oil prices

StatCounter

 
StatCounter
hits
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox