Climate Conversation Group

Taking the heat out of global warming

For the first time in history, people shouting “the end is nigh” are somehow
the sane ones, while those of us who say it is not are now the lunatics.

  • rss
  • Home
  • Open threads
    • Climate – how to use open threads
      • Meteorology
      • Global warming
      • Climate science
        • Climate Models
        • Papers
        • Atmosphere
        • Temperature records
        • Energy and fuel
        • Solar
        • Ocean heat content
        • Radiation, radiative imbalance
        • Sea levels
        • Ocean acidification
        • Polar regions, glaciers and ice
      • Regions
        • Europe
        • Asia
        • South America
        • Africa
        • Australia
        • UK
        • USA
        • Pacific
        • New Zealand
      • News
      • Controversy and scandal
        • Skeptical Science
      • Disproving AGW
      • Economics
    • Politics
      • ETS and carbon taxes
    • UN
      • IPCC organisation
      • IPCC politics
      • IPCC science
      • NIPCC
  • Opinion polls
    • SckSckSck
    • Your view of CO2
    • Collective noun for icebergs
    • Stop the ETS
  • Climate of Freedom Tour
  • Files
    • Climate Realists
      • Newsletter #17 6 May 2010
      • Newsletter #16 28 Apr 2010
      • Newsletter #6 11 Feb 2010
      • Newsletter #4 2011
    • News releases
      • February 8, 2010
      • December 20, 2010
    • Wind turbine failures
  • About

Opinion polls

Opinion poll graph

There are many things we’d like to know your thinking on, and they are all here at our Online Poll Centre. Some of the questions might cause you to go away and research them; this is excellent. We hope our questions are thought-provoking, so that whatever “side” of the climate “debate” you think you’re on, you get provoked into thinking about the question and not just reacting from habit. If you decide to do further research, that is no bad thing, for it will make you better informed.

It may have been Socrates who said: “I would rather be corrected, than continue in my ignorance.”

In many ways, the main climate-change question is: is it our fault? That’s because we’re being expected to “fix” it. We ask your opinion of that in the “sckscksck” poll, which is our riposte to the “tcktcktck” campaign from the ecomentalists, the one that got us riled up but that failed in Copenhagen.

We call Greenpeace and others the ecomentalists to distinguish them from the proper and benign environmentalists, who are genuinely intelligent and practical about looking after the world around us. Ecomentalists are extremists who want to destroy the modern human way of life, or send it so far back into the past it might as well be destroyed, so that “nature” can carry on happily without us, as it should — as is only natural.

Ecomentalists happily promote a natural way of life for everybody, and especially for third-world people, those still in mud huts and burning dung for cooking, who desperately want access to the same levels of electricity and running water that we enjoy. Ecomentalists promote the old way of life so steadfastly that they refuse to allow native people access to “high-carbon” fuels in any serious quantities.

We’ll add new questions as they occur to us. They’ll probably be related to climate in some way, but we won’t guarantee it, since we like to have fun, too.

So choose a question from the list below and let us know what your opinion is. By all means write your comments on the polls too, and tell us you disagree with them or they’re too hard, they’re stupid, old hat, obscure, etc. You can address your comments to the Climate Conversation Group, me personally, the government, a favourite band, the UN or life itself.

Feel free to express yourself thoroughly (although any badness will be removed). Of course, check back here for new polls.

Online polls

sckscksck – Is the earth warming dangerously from human activities?

Your view of CO2 – Does CO2 dominate the climate?

Collective noun for icebergs – What’s the best collective noun for icebergs?

– Richard Treadgold

Ostrich

Tags
General links

Sorry, comments are closed.

buy FastProof now

          • Climate Conversation Group •
   • more than 1,400,000 visits a year
   • over 7,600,000 hits a year
               — join the Conversation —

Hot off the press

  • Strike two for TVNZ
  • GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Painting wanting rebuttal
  • Emotional knowledge
  • Global warming less than we thought
  • Climate porkies from TV One
  • Renwick doesn’t blame AGW for drought
  • Renowden a scaring warmist
  • Hide sticks it to Renwick
  • The incredibly elusive absolute surface air temperature
  • Faults, fallacies and failures of wind power
  • For real striving, give up the driving
  • Cost to ‘restore climate’ a game-changer
  • Signs of strain in justifying climate predictions
  • Is the game nearly over
  • IPCC created and controlled by activists
  • Policy: politicians write it but scientists incite it
  • The industry of denial
  • Lord Monckton complains to VUW
  • Climate forecasts fulfilled or what?

Latest comments

  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Thomas on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on Strike two for TVNZ
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Andy on Strike two for TVNZ
  • Thomas on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard C (NZ) on Strike two for TVNZ
  • Andy on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Richard Treadgold on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Mike Jowsey on GWPF, RS talk climate change
  • Huub Bakker on Strike two for TVNZ
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • Andy on Global warming less than we thought
  • Richard C (NZ) on USA
  • Richard C (NZ) on USA
  • Richard C (NZ) on Global warming less than we thought

PayPal Tip Jar
Even a couple of dollars helps us
(if you're in the mood). Thanks!


Click to get your own widget

Tags

Activists AGW Air temperature Air temperature Alarmists Alternative energy Australia Carbon dioxide Carbon Sense Carbon trading CCG blog Christopher Monckton Climate Conversation Group Climate research Climate Science Court action Data quality Disproving AGW Economics Energy supply Environmentalism ETS General Global temperature Global warming Hot Topic IPCC Journalism New Zealand NIWA NIWAgate NZCSC NZ Herald NZ temperature records Oceans Politics Royal Society Sceptics Science bias Scientists Sea levels United Nations USA Watts Up With That What is the evidence

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Climate change links

  • Bishop Hill
  • Carbon Sense Coalition
  • Climate Audit—a science blog
  • Climate Debate Daily
  • Climate Depot
  • Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
  • Climate Realists
  • Global warming at a glance
  • Jo Nova
  • Kiwi Thinker
  • NZ Climate Science Coalition
  • Science of Doom
  • Watts Up With That

 

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Previous posts

Oil prices

models v. reality
Latest climate models v. reality

As the models continue to leave actual temperature readings in their dust, sizeable warming halted about 1995 — although it might resume at any time. It must hasten to have any hope of catching up with the predictions.

If you claim warming continues, we want evidence of continued warming — eminently reasonable. Making us wait for 17 years for that evidence invites us to doubt you.

Claiming that warming hasn't stopped is the same as claiming it has — and both are ridiculous, for nobody knows the future. The best you can do is describe the past.

Click graph for larger version.

 

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox