<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Climate Conversation Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/climate-conversation-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A letter to Gavin Schmidt goes unanswered</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/a-letter-to-gavin-schmidt-goes-unanswered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/a-letter-to-gavin-schmidt-goes-unanswered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gavin Schmidt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has taken me a while to follow up on this letter I sent to Gavin Schmidt on 5 March, 2010. It will come as no surprise to anyone that he hasn&#8217;t deigned to answer my email. However, as it expresses succinctly some of the main defences against the &#8220;denier&#8221; appellation I&#8217;ll put it up [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/a-letter-to-gavin-schmidt-goes-unanswered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perspective, raw and bleeding</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/perspective-raw-and-bleeding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/perspective-raw-and-bleeding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 04:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Parachute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sciblogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alexa NZ rankings The best in New Zealand is no. 1. All others fall into line astern according to their number. So far, we at the Climate Conversation are proud of our standing. However, should this ranking fall, we will still be proud of our standing. Latest rankings &#8211; 21 June, 2011 (The closer the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/perspective-raw-and-bleeding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When does an adjustment become a replacement?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/when-does-an-adjustment-become-a-replacement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/when-does-an-adjustment-become-a-replacement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our trusty family axe. The handle has been replaced four or five times and I know the head has been lost at least once. But it&#8217;s over 150 years old and it&#8217;s a family heirloom — we&#8217;d never part with it. UPDATE: March 27, 8:50 p.m. A reader points out that a replacement requires the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/when-does-an-adjustment-become-a-replacement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submission to 2050 Emissions Target &#8220;Consultation&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/submission-to-2050-emissions-target-consultation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/submission-to-2050-emissions-target-consultation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 03:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is my submission to the 2050 Emissions Reduction Target Consultation, as invited by the Minister for Climate Change Issues, the Hon Dr Nick Smith, in his position paper Gazetting New Zealand’s 2050 Emissions Target, published last month. The central argument is a challenge to the Minister and his department to show us the evidence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/submission-to-2050-emissions-target-consultation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIWA&#8217;s review taking a hiding</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/niwas-review-taking-a-hiding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/niwas-review-taking-a-hiding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Official Information Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Questions raised over review of NZ temps On 16 December, 2010, just before Christmas, just after the Parliament had risen for the year, just as the citizenry were rushing around doing Christmassy things and just as, necessarily, their oh-so-short memories of the year just gone were fading, NIWA released their long-promised review of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/niwas-review-taking-a-hiding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIWA&#8217;s review: what are they hiding?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/niwas-review-what-are-they-hiding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/niwas-review-what-are-they-hiding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Official Information Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; NIWA refuses our OIA request—but why? … continued from my initial post describing the weak endorsement from the Bureau of Meteorology of NIWA&#8217;s review of the official NZ temperature record (NZTR) and my subsequent demand under the OIA for copies of correspondence with the Bureau. What has NIWA got to hide? They bought the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/niwas-review-what-are-they-hiding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perrott puts his foot in his mouth</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/perrott-puts-his-foot-in-his-mouth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/perrott-puts-his-foot-in-his-mouth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Parachute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Perrott uses his mouth a lot. Now he puts his foot in it, along with his mate Gareth. Then Renowden joins him Our most vocal critic, Ken Perrott, has chanced upon a file I just posted, containing the unadjusted temperature data which was the subject of our paper, Are We Feeling Warmer Yet? (AWFWY), [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/perrott-puts-his-foot-in-his-mouth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No puerile sarcasm</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/no-puerile-sarcasm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/no-puerile-sarcasm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 02:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Parachute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sciblogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a comment made today by Ken Perrott. Unfortunately his comments are copied immediately on Sciblogs, lending them a dignity they don&#8217;t deserve. Ken referred to the CCG as containing: &#8220;puerile sarcasm aimed at denying the credibility of scientists and honest science.&#8221; I don&#8217;t believe there is any &#8220;puerile sarcasm&#8221; here, and I would like [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/no-puerile-sarcasm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Never the twain shall meet</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/never-the-twain-shall-meet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/never-the-twain-shall-meet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sceptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The finger of God, which Man approaches so closely. Do they ever meet? OH, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet, Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God’s great Judgment Seat; But there is neither East nor West, Border, nor Breed, nor Birth, When two strong men stand [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/02/never-the-twain-shall-meet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flaherty slays denier Delingpole, takes aim at me</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/flaherty-slays-denier-delingpole-takes-aim-at-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/flaherty-slays-denier-delingpole-takes-aim-at-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Delingpole—alive, well and, we hope, undamaged after the efforts of this uppity slayer. Wherein Flaherty is thanked and congratulated, it is explained where Flaherty goes wrong in his criticisms of me, and the reader is reminded of what is still outstanding in connection with NIWA&#8217;s Review report. Delingpole gains a mention. Matt Flaherty has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/flaherty-slays-denier-delingpole-takes-aim-at-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

