<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Michael Mann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/michael-mann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:12:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Climategate Part 2 — 2,000-page epic of science and scepticism</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-2-%e2%80%94-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-2-%e2%80%94-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRU leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Mann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Briffa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=2318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First published at the National Post: December 21, 2009, 2:33 pm
There&#8217;s trouble over tree rings as the Climategate emails reveal a rift between scientists. For Part 1, go here.
By Terence Corcoran
In the thousands of emails released last month in what is now known as Climategate, the greatest battles took place over scientists’ attempts to reconstruct [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-2-%e2%80%94-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climategate Part 1 &#8211; 2,000-page epic of science and scepticism</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-1-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-1-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRU leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Mann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Briffa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=2285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This summary from the National Post of the Climategate emails and what has been discovered in them is the best I have seen. It is especially pleasing to hear Terence Corcoran&#8217;s moderate tone. The contents of the released emails and computer code throw strong doubt on the conclusions of the science of global warming. Everything [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/12/climategate-part-1-2000-page-epic-of-science-and-scepticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hockey stick</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2007/01/the-hockey-stick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2007/01/the-hockey-stick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 05:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Mann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/blog/?p=893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a story you haven&#8217;t heard, and you should have. An analyst, working for the government, uses computers to crunch numbers and find the truth. Let&#8217;s call him &#8220;Mann.&#8221; The trouble with Mann is, he has an ideology. He knows what he wants his results to be. more…
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2007/01/the-hockey-stick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
