<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; New Zealand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/new-zealand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More about the NZ temperature record</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started preparing this last August, when the NZ Climate Science Coalition published its audit of NIWA&#8217;s review of the official NZ temperature record. The topic is important to me, so now, embarrassed, I tidy it up because it&#8217;ll do more good being posted in the wild than sitting on my hard drive. &#8211; Richard [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NZ gives in to common climate sense</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/nz-gives-in-on-common-climate-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/nz-gives-in-on-common-climate-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fresh breath of air just blew through the climate. New Zealand (with its buddies Australia) refuse to do more for the climate if nobody else does. Our climate negotiator, Tim Groser, said what we&#8217;ve been telling the Nats for years: “You will not carry public opinion if the debate is ‘you are the only [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/nz-gives-in-on-common-climate-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NZ shale gas &#8211; will we get lucky?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/nz-shale-gas-will-we-get-lucky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/nz-shale-gas-will-we-get-lucky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A member of the NZ Climate Science Coalition asked about shale gas exploration in New Zealand. He received the following reply. &#8212; RT I can advise that several petroleum exploration companies are actively looking at shale gas potential in NZ. At present almost all of the onshore eastern North Island (the &#8220;East Coast Basin&#8221;, east [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/nz-shale-gas-will-we-get-lucky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liquid fossil fuels and climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/liquid-fossil-fuels-and-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/liquid-fossil-fuels-and-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 01:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much does our ETS increase petrol &#038; power prices? The following passage is from our government&#8217;s web page explaining the ETS. It&#8217;s only a short piece, but there are numerous examples of non-sequiturs, or illogical derivations from the previous statement. Anyone convinced it&#8217;s based on science or logic? Anyone at all? The government reasons* [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/liquid-fossil-fuels-and-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public service balanced or merely on a knife edge?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/public-service-balanced-or-merely-on-a-knife-edge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/public-service-balanced-or-merely-on-a-knife-edge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 00:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our friend Mike Jowsey says in comments: &#8220;It is headed for a total government of NZ by Maori. Think of Fiji or Rhodesia.&#8221; A scant three hours earlier, I received Colin James&#8217;s Management Magazine column for September 2011, which I reproduce below. The synchronicity of topics is unmistakable and James&#8217; optimism clear. I take heart [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/public-service-balanced-or-merely-on-a-knife-edge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A wee debate</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/a-wee-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/a-wee-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monckton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Monckton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone wants it; some don&#8217;t want to share. Free speech in New Zealand? Everyone claims the right to free speech, but not necessarily for &#8216;others&#8217;. All talk of curbing free speech is for &#8216;other&#8217; people, never for oneself. What is a debate? It&#8217;s just a few people talking to each other. Who could be afraid [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/a-wee-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First icebergs, now penguins</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/first-icebergs-now-penguins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/first-icebergs-now-penguins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penguins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emperor penguin claims Pekapeka Beach, Kapiti Coast. First such visitor recorded here since 1967. Oh, it&#8217;s cooling all right It&#8217;s got so cold here that penguins are arriving. One Emperor penguin&#8217;s long, lonely journey &#8212; 3300 km. The NZ Herald has some great shots of Mr Emperor on the beach, taking in the sights and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/first-icebergs-now-penguins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rachel recycles climate con</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/rachel-recycles-climate-con/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/rachel-recycles-climate-con/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Taranaki Daily News two days ago published a polemic notable more for its rancour than its precision regarding climatic facts. It&#8217;s a good example of one-eyed thinking, skewed views and perfectly furious ad hominem attacks &#8212; all teeth and talons and only the hissing missing. Lost her cuddly toy? Written by the doubtless-locally-renowned scribe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/rachel-recycles-climate-con/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renowden has no evidence for CAGW</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/renowden-has-no-evidence-for-cagw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/renowden-has-no-evidence-for-cagw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jo Nova created this iconic cartoon of the shaky evidence for CAGW. This is in response (slightly delayed by an Easter break) to the list of &#8220;proofs&#8221; produced by Gareth Renowden, at Hot Topic, in answer to my request of Sir Peter Gluckman, the PM&#8217;s scientific advisor, for evidence of a human cause for anticipated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/renowden-has-no-evidence-for-cagw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Gluckman wants evidence too</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/now-gluckman-wants-evidence-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/now-gluckman-wants-evidence-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sir Peter Gluckman wants to see the evidence. So do we. How quickly the climate debate changes From the Office of the Prime Minister&#8217;s Science Advisory Committee comes an announcement with the heading: Release of an important report on the relationship between evidence and policy formation It begins: One of the key challenges for all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/now-gluckman-wants-evidence-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

