<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; NZ Herald</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/nz-herald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Laking, liking words, lacking in science</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-liking-words-lacks-in-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-liking-words-lacks-in-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCG blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Laking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opponents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not possible even to keep track of the alarmist stories about climate, far less to refute them all. But when one is personally cited close to home and statements are wrongfully attributed to one, one ought to address them. This Laking/Herald howler is a case in point. Laking has taken his information from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/laking-liking-words-lacks-in-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame or repair?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/blame-or-repair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/blame-or-repair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Herald today fumes over fumes from farming. There&#8217;s so much in their editorial with which to take issue, but a single point glares out from the page. They say: The whole point of the ETS is that emitters take financial responsibility. The Herald appears to replace concern for the environment with a vindictive crusade [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/blame-or-repair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barton earns Canadian rebuke</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/barton-earns-canadian-rebuke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/barton-earns-canadian-rebuke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris de Freitas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donna Laframboise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Chris de Freitas This post could be considered tardy. However Donna Laframboise&#8217;s illuminating comments lose nothing with the passage of time. They deserve circulation and Auckland&#8217;s possibly best-known sceptical climate scientist deserves her thoughtful and eloquent support. Four weeks ago, on July 16, the Herald published Chris Barton&#8217;s attack on Chris de Freitas&#8217;s integrity. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/barton-earns-canadian-rebuke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renowden misdirects in a septic meander</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/renowden-misdirects-in-a-septic-meander/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/renowden-misdirects-in-a-septic-meander/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris de Freitas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[de Freitas feeds his students sceptic propaganda … So says the radical Renowden, he of the non-sceptical &#8220;believe everything they say&#8221; warmist persuasion. But read what he says about Chris de Freitas&#8217; crimes and you&#8217;ll realise he says nothing, because no crimes exist. Gareth Renowden is himself guilty of attempting to abridge the academic freedom [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/renowden-misdirects-in-a-septic-meander/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>de Freitas on solid ground</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/de-freitas-on-solid-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/de-freitas-on-solid-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris de Freitas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is weather? (h/t Bob D for most of the references) Journalist Chris Barton has a story in yesterday&#8217;s Herald titled The climate dissenter holds his ground. After looking at Barton&#8217;s alarmist arguments I&#8217;ll stand with Chris de Freitas on the solid ground. The story begins with the implication (not that the journalist says it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/de-freitas-on-solid-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Herald&#8217;s editor ducks the issue</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/heralds-editor-ducks-the-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/heralds-editor-ducks-the-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Murphy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A duck assassination. Sad, but assassinating the duck illustrates an ad hominem attack. There&#8217;s a head in the sights, but no insights ahead. You might kill the duck, but you&#8217;re out for a duck if you duck the issue. There&#8217;s no argument in this tepid denial of reactor safety, and without a challenge, the point [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/heralds-editor-ducks-the-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading on our emotions</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/trading-on-our-emotions-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/trading-on-our-emotions-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Natural wisps of cloud in the thin Auckland air on 4 January. It is into such thin air as this that all our atmospheric emissions disappear. I said &#8216;disappear&#8217; and I meant it, because our emissions of &#8216;greenhouse&#8217; gases are literally invisible. In addition, nearly half of them get absorbed into the land and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/trading-on-our-emotions-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer model is not evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/computer-model-is-not-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/computer-model-is-not-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris de Freitas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Campbell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Letter sent to the Herald on 7 Jan, 2011 Dear Sir, It has come to my attention that you published a (further) letter from a Dr Doug Campbell, again challenging Professor Chris de Freitas&#8217; recent article about the science of global warming. Dr Campbell said: &#8220;The facts support anthropogenic global warming with a doubling of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/computer-model-is-not-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Many surprised to learn global warming basics</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/many-surprised-to-learn-global-warming-basics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/many-surprised-to-learn-global-warming-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 10:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris de Freitas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the pen of Chris de Freitas comes this short but compelling narrative, inspired and inspiring, and calming, like a cool balm on an inflammation. Read it and watch the heat from the global warming debate dissipate and important issues clarify. Reprinted here with Chris&#8217; kind permission. Chris de Freitas: Emotion clouding underlying science of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/many-surprised-to-learn-global-warming-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting climate change public insanity</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/11/fighting-climate-change-public-insanity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/11/fighting-climate-change-public-insanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right setting for tough international negotiations; it would keep everyone cool. In the NZ Herald last Wednesday, David Venables, executive-director of the Greenhouse Policy Coalition, talked about world leaders at Cancun soon putting &#8220;the finishing touches to a global agreement on climate change.&#8221; Why do we want such an agreement? Though Mr Venables, oddly, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/11/fighting-climate-change-public-insanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

