<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; NZ temperature records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/nz-temperature-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NZ temperature record &#8212; it&#8217;s worse than we thought</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/02/nz-temperature-record-its-worse-than-we-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/02/nz-temperature-record-its-worse-than-we-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to those who advised me of this amazing email from the Climategate 2 collection, either through comments here or private email. It concerns the pre-1930 cooling of the New Zealand temperature record, and makes food for thought, especially for those supporting NIWA, Salinger and the increasingly shaky AGW story. Although it&#8217;s more of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/02/nz-temperature-record-its-worse-than-we-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More about the NZ temperature record</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started preparing this last August, when the NZ Climate Science Coalition published its audit of NIWA&#8217;s review of the official NZ temperature record. The topic is important to me, so now, embarrassed, I tidy it up because it&#8217;ll do more good being posted in the wild than sitting on my hard drive. &#8211; Richard [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/more-about-the-nz-temperature-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming spreads by word of morph</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/global-warming-spreads-by-word-of-morph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/global-warming-spreads-by-word-of-morph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in New Zealand, the NZ Climate Science Coalition has battled for several years to understand the national temperature record and get the data released that lies behind it. Now we battle to correct it.&#160;Because NIWA, in &#8220;reconstructing&#8221; the record, manages miraculously to lower past temperatures and increase recent ones to create a spurious warming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/global-warming-spreads-by-word-of-morph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One man&#8217;s mission</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/one-mans-mission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/one-mans-mission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Salinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will NIWA ever be free of Jim Salinger? What will it take to rid the organisation of his pervasive influence? He was fired long ago for his maverick media mouth, but his spirit never leaves, and the bright ideas of his younger self, not good enough to attract other scientists, still torment NIWA&#8217;s management as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/one-mans-mission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIWA&#8217;s sham: but wait — there&#8217;s more</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/niwas-sham-but-wait-%e2%80%94-theres-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/niwas-sham-but-wait-%e2%80%94-theres-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Holy Grail Independently peer-reviewed scientific papers published in learned journals are the Holy Grail of climate science alarmists, and the IPCC in particular. So they want to get friendly papers in and keep contrary papers out. The Climategate emails show continuous collusion between members of the “Hockey Team” to prevent journal publication of any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/niwas-sham-but-wait-%e2%80%94-theres-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incredible sham from NIWA</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/fraud-or-fumble-from-niwa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/fraud-or-fumble-from-niwa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NIWA shows 168% more warming than Rhoades &#038; Salinger &#8211; the method NIWA betrayed. The blue dashed line shows the warming trend when the method is used correctly. The red line reveals NIWA&#8217;s outrageous fraud &#8211; it&#8217;s much stronger warming, but it&#8217;s empty of truth. NIWA didn&#8217;t use Rhoades &#038; Salinger. We can prove it. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/fraud-or-fumble-from-niwa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What warming?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/what-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/what-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 06:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NIWA&#8217;s paper finds strong warming. But when their temperature data are processed according to the proper methodology, there&#8217;s no unusual warming. Throughout their paper, NIWA cite the proper method, but they never use it. Why not? NIWA&#8217;s data confirms: little warming When it&#8217;s calculated correctly Why did they lie to us? In December last year, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/what-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some questions for the BoM&#8217;s FOI executive</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/some-questions-for-the-boms-foi-executive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/some-questions-for-the-boms-foi-executive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 02:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8211; by Barry Brill, Chairman of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition Warwick Hughes’ request under the Australian Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), has been declined by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) on the grounds that it might divulge information supplied “under an obligation of confidentiality” by a foreign Government to the Australian Federal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/some-questions-for-the-boms-foi-executive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, really — what are they hiding?!</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/no-really-%e2%80%94-what-are-they-hiding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/no-really-%e2%80%94-what-are-they-hiding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 11:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of the 159 documents in BoM’s “Schedule” are said to be communications received in confidence by the Australian Federal Government from a foreign Government. Hah! They simply cannot reconcile that claim with these actual Bureau descriptions: Have a look at them: These documents didn&#8217;t come from a foreign country, much less a foreign Government [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/no-really-%e2%80%94-what-are-they-hiding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the Aussies hiding?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/what-are-the-aussies-hiding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/what-are-the-aussies-hiding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 11:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing Australian storm seems to reach down to a puny, isolated ship. This is emblematic of our lonely struggle with a gargantuan government bureaucracy. What secrets, sinister or not, does the storm conceal? Will our two countries&#8217; information laws combine to reveal them or to hide them away forever? In Australia, Warwick Hughes has followed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/05/what-are-the-aussies-hiding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

