<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; NZCSC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/nzcsc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No global warming in New Zealand</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/no-global-warming-in-new-zealand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/no-global-warming-in-new-zealand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In July last year the NZ Climate Science Coalition published an independent analysis of NIWA&#8217;s reconstruction of our national temperature record (NZTR) entitled New Zealand – Unaffected by Global Warming. It&#8217;s the only independent analysis carried out on the reconstruction (nobody else has bothered). As far as I know, nobody much has even read the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2012/01/no-global-warming-in-new-zealand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICSC rejects notion of &#8220;climate debt&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/icsc-rejects-notion-of-climate-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/icsc-rejects-notion-of-climate-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=12145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention: News Editors, Political, Science and Environment Reporters MEDIA RELEASE International Climate Science Coalition Rejects Durban Agreement to set New Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets No “Climate Debt” is owed to developing countries Ottawa, Canada, December 11, 2011: “Developed nations are not guilty of causing the climate change that developing nations claim they are suffering,” said [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/12/icsc-rejects-notion-of-climate-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only threat to Christchurch is Salinger&#8217;s alarmism</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/only-threat-to-christchurch-is-salingers-alarmism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/only-threat-to-christchurch-is-salingers-alarmism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christchurch earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Salinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea levels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The moment of the sudden earthquake where none had been known before. Click for larger version. From the Christchurch Press today comes alarming news: Rising sea levels are a greater threat to Christchurch&#8217;s seaside suburbs than previously realised, a climate scientist is warning. Speaking at Canterbury University this afternoon, Jim Salinger said latest estimates could [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/only-threat-to-christchurch-is-salingers-alarmism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suddenly everyone hates farming</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/suddenly-everyone-hates-farming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/suddenly-everyone-hates-farming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few people admire farming as we once did when we understood where this country&#8217;s wealth was created. On the contrary, farming has come under sustained attack, and from none more strongly than the National Party, once almost a fellowship of farmers and the industry&#8217;s staunchest supporter. Now our formerly admired farmers must tolerate the impending [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/suddenly-everyone-hates-farming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doubling ETS tax acceptable to Minister but not to Kiwis</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/doubling-ets-tax-acceptable-to-minister-but-not-to-kiwis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/doubling-ets-tax-acceptable-to-minister-but-not-to-kiwis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barry Brill&#8217;s sharp analysis brings the ridiculous, unsustainable logic of the Hon Nick Smith under a scrutiny it cannot weather &#8212; and that&#8217;s without even mentioning the absence of scientific support for the theory of dangerous anthropogenic global warming. What warming? What sea level rise? The sooner John Key&#8217;s cabinet realises how Key and Smith [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/doubling-ets-tax-acceptable-to-minister-but-not-to-kiwis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courting NIWA</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/courting-niwa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/courting-niwa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NIWA is creeping closer to court to answer our allegations. It can&#8217;t fudge the facts in there. Where the fudges have judges UPDATE 1, 16 Sep 9:30 &#8211; If anyone harbours lingering doubts that NIWA claim to have used a particular method in calculating the adjustments in their &#8220;Review report&#8221; published last December, let them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/courting-niwa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incredible sham from NIWA</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/fraud-or-fumble-from-niwa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/fraud-or-fumble-from-niwa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NIWA shows 168% more warming than Rhoades &#038; Salinger &#8211; the method NIWA betrayed. The blue dashed line shows the warming trend when the method is used correctly. The red line reveals NIWA&#8217;s outrageous fraud &#8211; it&#8217;s much stronger warming, but it&#8217;s empty of truth. NIWA didn&#8217;t use Rhoades &#038; Salinger. We can prove it. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/fraud-or-fumble-from-niwa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What warming?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/what-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/what-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 06:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NIWA&#8217;s paper finds strong warming. But when their temperature data are processed according to the proper methodology, there&#8217;s no unusual warming. Throughout their paper, NIWA cite the proper method, but they never use it. Why not? NIWA&#8217;s data confirms: little warming When it&#8217;s calculated correctly Why did they lie to us? In December last year, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/08/what-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When does an adjustment become a replacement?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/when-does-an-adjustment-become-a-replacement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/when-does-an-adjustment-become-a-replacement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our trusty family axe. The handle has been replaced four or five times and I know the head has been lost at least once. But it&#8217;s over 150 years old and it&#8217;s a family heirloom — we&#8217;d never part with it. UPDATE: March 27, 8:50 p.m. A reader points out that a replacement requires the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/when-does-an-adjustment-become-a-replacement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not warming, you nitwit &#8212; it&#8217;s cooling</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/its-not-warming-you-nitwit-its-cooling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/its-not-warming-you-nitwit-its-cooling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McLean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent domestic icicles in Germany brought on by the mind-altering greenhouse gas, CO2. All right, so it might not be getting down to out-of-the-ordinary freezing temperatures, but it&#8217;s certainly not unduly warm, which is the claim we&#8217;re constantly hearing in the mainstream media, even now. Even after all the contrary evidence. Here&#8217;s more. To show [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/03/its-not-warming-you-nitwit-its-cooling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

