<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Parliament</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/parliament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Odd numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/03/odd-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/03/odd-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=4348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peeling the onion in the Parliament. Like the onion, everything associated with Parliament has layers. As we make our way through the Parliamentary questions we discover more and more. NIWA supply temperature data to the big overseas teams that maintain the global temperature datasets, including NASA, NOAA, the Hadley Centre, the WMO, NCDC and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/03/odd-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suspicious warming trend proof of bias?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/03/suspicious-warming-trend-proof-of-bias/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/03/suspicious-warming-trend-proof-of-bias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=4311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peeling the onion in the Parliament. The NZ Parliament Building in the capital, Wellington. The attached &#8220;Beehive&#8221; (affectionate local name bestowed for obvious reasons), provides office accommodation for MPs and staff. Questions asked in the Parliament of ministers of the Crown must be answered unless they concern &#8220;operational matters&#8221;. Like the onion, everything associated with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/03/suspicious-warming-trend-proof-of-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

