<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Peter Gluckman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/peter-gluckman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Renowden has no evidence for CAGW</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/renowden-has-no-evidence-for-cagw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/renowden-has-no-evidence-for-cagw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jo Nova created this iconic cartoon of the shaky evidence for CAGW. This is in response (slightly delayed by an Easter break) to the list of &#8220;proofs&#8221; produced by Gareth Renowden, at Hot Topic, in answer to my request of Sir Peter Gluckman, the PM&#8217;s scientific advisor, for evidence of a human cause for anticipated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/renowden-has-no-evidence-for-cagw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Gluckman wants evidence too</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/now-gluckman-wants-evidence-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/now-gluckman-wants-evidence-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sir Peter Gluckman wants to see the evidence. So do we. How quickly the climate debate changes From the Office of the Prime Minister&#8217;s Science Advisory Committee comes an announcement with the heading: Release of an important report on the relationship between evidence and policy formation It begins: One of the key challenges for all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/now-gluckman-wants-evidence-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gluckman: knows nothing about climate</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/gluckman-knows-nothing-about-climate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/gluckman-knows-nothing-about-climate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michele Hewitson That incomparable writer, Miss Michele Hewitson, of the NZ Herald, has interviewed our Chief Scientific Advisor, Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, and the report appears in today&#8217;s edition. Now, Michele often specialises in the human side of your famous person, not perhaps delving too far into the deeds and sayings for which he might [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/gluckman-knows-nothing-about-climate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gluckman stumbles, Part 2 &#8211; Sludge</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/07/gluckman-stumbles-part-2-sludge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/07/gluckman-stumbles-part-2-sludge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=5961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lies are often dressed up as truth. Yet even with the truth in ruins, we can still get lucky and stumble upon it. UPDATE 18 July &#8211; see end (Royal Society) This is the second instalment of a review of Professor Sir Peter Gluckman&#8217;s speech of 9 June, entitled Integrity in Science: Implications from and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/07/gluckman-stumbles-part-2-sludge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gluckman stumbles on the truth</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/07/gluckman-stumbles-on-the-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/07/gluckman-stumbles-on-the-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=5803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Truth lies in lies and lies lie in truth, so in the climate fiasco, what is the truth, which the lies? Perhaps the truth even lies in ruins, but in searching we can get lucky and stumble on it. Our quite new Chief Science Advisor, Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, addresses scepticism towards global warming. But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/07/gluckman-stumbles-on-the-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PM&#8217;s Chief Science Adviser must change &#8212; or go</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/06/pms-chief-science-adviser-must-change-or-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/06/pms-chief-science-adviser-must-change-or-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 04:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=5776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, the Prime Minister&#8217;s Chief Science Advisor. Here is a statement issued yesterday by Terry Dunleavy, Hon Secretary of the NZ Climate Science Coalition. UPDATE 21 June: see end of post Prime Minister John Key has been asked by a former National Party activist either to rein in his Chief Science Adviser, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/06/pms-chief-science-adviser-must-change-or-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gluckman &#8212; great baby doctor but no climate scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/06/gluckman-great-baby-doctor-but-no-climate-scientist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/06/gluckman-great-baby-doctor-but-no-climate-scientist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=5707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ODT reports Professor Sir Peter Gluckman&#8217;s speech last night (you&#8217;ll remember him, he&#8217;s the PM&#8217;s chief science advisor). As expected, the speech seems to have been mainly waffle with few new facts or arguments. However, the Professor informs us that New Zealand beech trees and swallows are feeling the heat. This is despite Phil [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/06/gluckman-great-baby-doctor-but-no-climate-scientist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

