<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Roy Spencer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/roy-spencer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Climate models get energy balance wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/climate-models-get-energy-balance-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/climate-models-get-energy-balance-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 08:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Spencer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (July 26, 2011) &#8212; Data from NASA&#8217;s Terra satellite show that when the climate warms, Earth&#8217;s atmosphere is apparently more efficient at releasing energy to space than models used to forecast climate change have been programmed to &#8220;believe.&#8221; The result is climate forecasts that are warming substantially faster than the atmosphere, says Dr. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/07/climate-models-get-energy-balance-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record warming caused by El Nino, not us</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/record-warming-caused-by-el-nino-not-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/record-warming-caused-by-el-nino-not-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 07:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Nino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Spencer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the record temperatures in 1998 and 2010 were caused by two strong El Ninos, they were not caused by our emissions of carbon dioxide. One or the other, but not both Our warming nerve has been over-stimulated. Every time we hear of warming we get defensive and/or afraid for the future. But there&#8217;s an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/record-warming-caused-by-el-nino-not-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cooling forecast comes true</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/12/cooling-forecast-comes-true/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/12/cooling-forecast-comes-true/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Spencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does this new method perform better than the IPCC? NIWA, where are you? The Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), according to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, is calculated from the monthly or seasonal fluctuations in the air pressure difference between Tahiti and Darwin. In July last year three climate scientists published a paper in the Journal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/12/cooling-forecast-comes-true/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Global Warming Blunder</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/the-great-global-warming-blunder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/the-great-global-warming-blunder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Spencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=5120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Mother Nature Fooled the World’s Top Climate Scientists I&#8217;ve reposted Roy&#8217;s announcement because the book sounds stunning and because of the penetrating comments he makes, such as: &#8220;Believe it or not, [a] potential natural explanation for recent warming has never been seriously researched by climate scientists.&#8221;&#8220;Clouds are the Earth’s sunshade, and if cloud cover [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/the-great-global-warming-blunder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPCC&#8217;s &#8216;lack of skill&#8217; &#8212; scientific malpractice?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/01/ipccs-lack-of-skill-scientific-malpractice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/01/ipccs-lack-of-skill-scientific-malpractice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Spencer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=3107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spencer &#8211; finding unsuspected climate processes In a dramatic recent article on his blog, Clouds Dominate CO2 as a Climate Driver Since 2000, Roy Spencer sets out clear evidence for internally-forced changes in the climate system. An internal forcing is a feedback, as when a change in temperature causes some other change which itself also [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/01/ipccs-lack-of-skill-scientific-malpractice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The audience strikes back</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/09/the-audience-strikes-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/09/the-audience-strikes-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Satterfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Spencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=1133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emptiness of AGW theory Dan Satterfield is an experienced TV meteorologist in Huntsville, Alabama&#8212;the town which is also home to the world-famous team led by Dr Roy Spencer that tracks the Earth&#8217;s temperature with satellites. Despite his credentials, despite the fact that he deals with climate information every day and despite the fact that he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/09/the-audience-strikes-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Set phasers on stun</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/03/set-phasers-on-stun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/03/set-phasers-on-stun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate sensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Spencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water vapour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/blog/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spencer claims that climate sensitivity has been &#8220;grossly overestimated&#8221; because of confusion over cause and effect between cloud cover and temperature. All the computer models now wrongly treat cloud cover as a positive feedback, amplifying warming. But some clouds directly cause warming (a forcing) and are not the result of warming (a feedback). He gives [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/03/set-phasers-on-stun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

