<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Royal Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/royal-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wool gets in the eyes</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/wool-gets-in-the-eyes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/wool-gets-in-the-eyes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea levels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=10208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woolly thinking? No, this is the Royal Society of NZ.Listen carefully as they try to pull the wool over your eyes. With the Royal Society smoke &#8216;n&#8217; sea level rise Last September, the Royal Society published a report entitled &#8220;SEA LEVEL RISE Emerging Issues&#8221;, available as a pdf (645 KB). In the accompanying press release [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/06/wool-gets-in-the-eyes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sea level rise is normal, my friends</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/sea-level-rise-is-normal-my-friends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/sea-level-rise-is-normal-my-friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea levels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=9457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The South Pacific Sea Level and Climate Monitoring Project (SPSLCMP) hasn&#8217;t been running for long and didn&#8217;t contribute to the new paper mentioned below, but we ought to remember that this Australian project exists. It constantly monitors sea level and other metrics in the countries named above and issues monthly reports. The warnings we hear [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/04/sea-level-rise-is-normal-my-friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like diamonds, CO2 is for ever</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/like-diamonds-co2-is-for-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/like-diamonds-co2-is-for-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The foam from a glass of ale. A common example of the innocent utility of carbon dioxide and another explanation of why, in our quest to reduce our so-called &#8220;carbon footprint&#8221;, some areas of life will always be out-of-bounds. Wrong again, huh? Hot Topic, in a post endearingly headed &#8220;I&#8217;ve been wrong before&#8220;, berates the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/like-diamonds-co2-is-for-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royal Society Humiliated</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/royal-society-humiliated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/royal-society-humiliated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Royal Society building, London. Global warming basic maths error First published at Suite101.com Thursday, October 14, 2010 by John O&#8217;Sullivan Top international experts prove British numbers on carbon dioxide are wrong. Royal Society blunder grossly exaggerates climate impact. This is an adopted article. German born chemist, Dr Klaus L. E. Kaiser has published evidence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/royal-society-humiliated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seismic shift in climate thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/seismic-shift-in-climate-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/seismic-shift-in-climate-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an adopted article. by Ben Webster of The Times Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 22:09 The Royal Society, bastion of conventional thinking on global warming, is about to announce a change in its thinking! What a glad day. I cannot wait to read their whole statement. &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;- Richard Here&#8217;s the full story: Royal Society [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/seismic-shift-in-climate-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royal Society gives us nightmare without the terror</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/royal-society-gives-us-nightmare-without-the-terror/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/royal-society-gives-us-nightmare-without-the-terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea levels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the stuff of nightmares; the Royal Society paper is the stuff of drowsy afternoon picnics. UPDATED 30 Sep 2010, 16:00 New graph comparing predictions from RSNZ and IPCC. Eye-opening! The Royal Society of New Zealand just published a paper, Sea Level Rise &#8211; Emerging Issues. It reports new, more alarming predictions of sea [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/royal-society-gives-us-nightmare-without-the-terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gluckman: knows nothing about climate</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/gluckman-knows-nothing-about-climate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/gluckman-knows-nothing-about-climate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michele Hewitson That incomparable writer, Miss Michele Hewitson, of the NZ Herald, has interviewed our Chief Scientific Advisor, Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, and the report appears in today&#8217;s edition. Now, Michele often specialises in the human side of your famous person, not perhaps delving too far into the deeds and sayings for which he might [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/gluckman-knows-nothing-about-climate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gluckman stumbles, Part 2 &#8211; Sludge</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/07/gluckman-stumbles-part-2-sludge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/07/gluckman-stumbles-part-2-sludge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Gluckman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=5961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lies are often dressed up as truth. Yet even with the truth in ruins, we can still get lucky and stumble upon it. UPDATE 18 July &#8211; see end (Royal Society) This is the second instalment of a review of Professor Sir Peter Gluckman&#8217;s speech of 9 June, entitled Integrity in Science: Implications from and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/07/gluckman-stumbles-part-2-sludge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Throw us a bone, mister?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/throw-us-a-bone-mister/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/throw-us-a-bone-mister/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is the evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=5057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A magnifying glass. Such a glass helps to find evidence of things too small for the human eye to distinguish. This offers a useful metaphor when looking for evidence of dangerous human-caused global warming. For, on the one hand, though it is highly likely there is a human influence on the climate at the global [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/throw-us-a-bone-mister/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trenberth and Royal Society clash head-on</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/trenberth-and-royal-society-clash-head-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/trenberth-and-royal-society-clash-head-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 03:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=5040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few fish in the sea, possibly searching for the &#8220;missing heat&#8221; they&#8217;ve heard about from some fishy friends. The whole affair&#8217;s a bit fishy, however, since the idea of heat hiding somewhere is unknown to science. Of a certainty, this is the first time the world has been warned it might be &#8220;haunted&#8221; by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/trenberth-and-royal-society-clash-head-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

