<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Science bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/science-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ridley warms heretical hearts</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/ridley-warms-heretical-hearts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/ridley-warms-heretical-hearts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Ridley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone loves well-crafted prose, even when the author of it opposes their point of view. So it is with Matt Ridley, well-known author of The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves, in less than a week earning nearly 9000 Google hits on his &#8220;Scientific heresy&#8221; address to the Royal Society of the Arts in Edinburgh on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/11/ridley-warms-heretical-hearts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trust in the IPCC</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/trust-in-the-ipcc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/trust-in-the-ipcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 04:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, yes, but it&#8217;s easy. More severe taxes will make people seriously cut their energy use, we could even move them down here to Antarctica. It&#8217;ll soon be warm enough. That will keep the Earth safe and protect it from changing. That&#8217;s all we want. Many people trust the IPCC, that it tells governments around [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/10/trust-in-the-ipcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cool that ice nonsense</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/cool-that-ice-nonsense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/cool-that-ice-nonsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea ice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=11367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The beautiful Arctic. Georg Heygster, head of the Physical Analysis of Remote Sensing Images unit at the University of Bremen&#8217;s Institute of Environmental Physics, announces a new record Arctic ice minimum today. Ignoring the fact that they actually report 140,000 square kilometres more ice today than in 2007 (the previous record minimum) because of altered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/09/cool-that-ice-nonsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Straight talking on that crooked consensus</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/straight-talking-on-that-crooked-consensus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/straight-talking-on-that-crooked-consensus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 06:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Solomon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=8255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crooked. Lawrence Solomon: 97% cooked stats First published in the Financial Post, Jan 3, 2011(h/t Gary Kerkin) by Lawrence Solomon How do we know there’s a scientific consensus on climate change? Pundits and the press tell us so. And how do the pundits and the press know? Until recently, they typically pointed to the number [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2011/01/straight-talking-on-that-crooked-consensus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hal Lewis resigns from the APS in protest</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/hal-lewis-resigns-from-the-aps-in-protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/hal-lewis-resigns-from-the-aps-in-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 03:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Physical Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=7047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Figuratively, of course, not literally, but this is what happens to scientists being employed in today&#8217;s climate (pun perhaps intended). Here&#8217;s a stern test of the neutrality of any science organisation, such as NIWA: does any scientist who doesn&#8217;t believe in man-made global warming work for them? If such &#8220;denialist&#8221; scientists are employed by a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/10/hal-lewis-resigns-from-the-aps-in-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seismic shift in climate thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/seismic-shift-in-climate-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/seismic-shift-in-climate-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an adopted article. by Ben Webster of The Times Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 22:09 The Royal Society, bastion of conventional thinking on global warming, is about to announce a change in its thinking! What a glad day. I cannot wait to read their whole statement. &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;- Richard Here&#8217;s the full story: Royal Society [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/seismic-shift-in-climate-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate panel must be purged</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/climate-panel-must-be-purged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/climate-panel-must-be-purged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Ridley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An adopted article. by Matt Ridley of The Times September 04, 2010, 12:00 noon After years of darkness, there are signs of light returning both to climate science and the mainstream media! What is instinctively unacceptable in one (uncontaminated) scientific realm is at last observed as being practically the rule in the (deeply flawed) realm [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/climate-panel-must-be-purged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AGW a cloak for dishonest science</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/agw-a-cloak-for-dishonest-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/agw-a-cloak-for-dishonest-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 03:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dishonesty may well conceal itself under a cloak such as this. A grey-haired New Zealand geologist has strong words to say about the practice of science, its abasement by proponents of AGW and the likely consequences for us all. Whether a general dishonesty in climate science is true or not, the fact that scientists themselves [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/agw-a-cloak-for-dishonest-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meltdown of the climate &#8216;consensus&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/meltdown-of-the-climate-consensus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/meltdown-of-the-climate-consensus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate profiteering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rajendra Pachauri &#8211; is science his real concern? From the New York Post, September 1, 2010. If this keeps up, no one&#8217;s going to trust any scientists. The global-warming establishment took a body blow this week, as the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change received a stunning rebuke from a top-notch independent investigation. For two [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/09/meltdown-of-the-climate-consensus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t scientists agree on Global Warming?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/08/why-cant-scientists-agree-on-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/08/why-cant-scientists-agree-on-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#8217;t get to this meeting, but Ross Muir went along and sends us this report. -&#160;Richard Click to go to the original cartoon, in The Skeptics Handbook, by Jo Nova. Last Thursday night the University of Auckland hosted an evening titled “Global Warming: Why can’t scientists agree?” As both the title and the list [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/08/why-cant-scientists-agree-on-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

