<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Conversation Group &#187; Watts Up With That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/tag/watts-up-with-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz</link>
	<description>Taking the heat out of global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NIWAgate now on WUWT</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/08/niwagate-now-on-wuwt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/08/niwagate-now-on-wuwt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NIWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conversation Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIWAgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ temperature records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZCSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=6215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Our application for an independent judicial examination of the national temperature record now featured on WUWT.

The tireless Anthony Watts reports our legal claim against NIWA (h/t to Andy).
May it encourage climate realists around the world to make a similar study of their national temperature history.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/08/niwagate-now-on-wuwt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Decreasing Influence of Carbon Dioxide</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/the-decreasing-influence-of-carbon-dioxide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/the-decreasing-influence-of-carbon-dioxide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Archibald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=4856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 8 March, 2010, David Archibald wrote a guest post on WUWT entitled &#8220;The Logarithmic Effect of Carbon Dioxide&#8221;. This was brought to my attention recently as an article worthy of attention, so here it is.
The greenhouse gases keep the Earth 30° C warmer than it would otherwise be without them in the atmosphere, so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/04/the-decreasing-influence-of-carbon-dioxide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the problem?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/02/whats-the-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/02/whats-the-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Treadgold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disproving AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willis Eschenbach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/?p=3837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The last post being sounded at a ceremony honouring the fallen. Is it time to bid farewell to the great global warming gambit?

The last post?
Here is the tireless, incomparable Willis Eschenbach posing a simple question and answering it simply and irrefutably. After reading this, all the alarmist nonsense in the world will make no difference [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2010/02/whats-the-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White roofs might cool a city, but hardly the globe</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/08/white-roofs-might-cool-a-city-but-hardly-the-globe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/08/white-roofs-might-cool-a-city-but-hardly-the-globe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wacky ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/blog/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Rudman, in White roofs are good for society, in the Herald last Wednesday, dredges up Professor Steven Chu&#8217;s wacky idea from last May to paint our roofs white, reflect more sunlight and thus temper the severe global warming presently afflicting us.
Professor Chu, US Energy Secretary and Nobel-prize-winning physicist, said lightening roofs and roads in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/08/white-roofs-might-cool-a-city-but-hardly-the-globe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A dreadful trend</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/06/a-dreadful-trend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/06/a-dreadful-trend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acidification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calcification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Skeptic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Barrier Reef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/blog/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a recent post by Steve McIntyre at Climate Audit that was difficult for some of us to understand. Fortunately, there&#8217;s an exposition of it at Climate Skeptic called &#8220;How to manufacture the trend you want&#8221; that makes it all clear. It&#8217;s regrettable, but please have a look.
It has to do with rates of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/06/a-dreadful-trend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global thermostat — too good to be true?</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/06/global-thermostat-too-good-to-be-true/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/06/global-thermostat-too-good-to-be-true/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temperature governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willis Eschenbach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/blog/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a stunning piece of work. Have a look. I hope to say more later.
Who knew that the sun has increased its output by 30% since the far geological past, and yet the earth did not heat up as it did so? It&#8217;s called the Faint Early Sun Paradox and it was always a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/06/global-thermostat-too-good-to-be-true/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clouding the issue</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/06/clouding-the-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/06/clouding-the-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/blog/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clouds are the issue in more than one facet of global warming. Apart from causing rain, clouds have two important effects: cooling and warming. Dr Roy Spencer, one of few scientists studying clouds, has said that a sustained change in cloud cover of just 1%, up or down, can cause a Medieval Warm Period or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2009/06/clouding-the-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax on Carbon Dioxide approved for Bay Area</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2008/05/tax-on-carbon-dioxide-approved-for-bay-area/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2008/05/tax-on-carbon-dioxide-approved-for-bay-area/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 05:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/blog/?p=589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A controversial new tax on CO2 emissions has just been set by the Air Quality Management board. Companies are to measure and report their own emissions. Businesses say out-of-area firms get an instant advantage over them. Once again, California leads the charge into radical action. Read the original story and see local comment on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2008/05/tax-on-carbon-dioxide-approved-for-bay-area/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global temperature for April</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2008/05/global-temperature-for-april/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2008/05/global-temperature-for-april/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 05:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/blog/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A review of the major world temperature datasets: RSS, UAH, HadCRUT and GISS. The world still cools but there is some disparity between the datasets and GISS gets axed from the graphs &#8212; can it be trusted? Read the full story at Watts Up With That.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2008/05/global-temperature-for-april/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just tell me the blasted temperature!</title>
		<link>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2008/05/just-tell-me-the-blasted-temperature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2008/05/just-tell-me-the-blasted-temperature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 05:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watts Up With That]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/blog/?p=618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a simple question: &#8220;What is the temperature of the earth?&#8221; But for those who live here it has no simple answer, nor ever will have&#8212;only approximations. For it not only depends on where you put the thermometer, but also, apparently, on who interprets it. For if you own the dataset, you can reduce older [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/2008/05/just-tell-me-the-blasted-temperature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
